Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:56:42 -0400, Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org> wrote:
The proposal (which comes from APNIC members, not from APNIC staff) concerns non-portable addresses assigned to end-users. I don't know about anybody else, but I've never had any luck getting a response from people in that category anyway; it's invariably the upstream ISPs who respond (if anybody does), and there is no suggestion that their contact details will be able to be hidden.
So what difference will it make?
Effectively none. APNIC has always served out unverified and obvious garbage from their whois servers. What I find offensive is that they are now codifying this lack of cooperation, and tacit complicity with spammers and other anonymous miscreants as official policy. matto
On 23 Sep 2004, at 18:06, Matt Ghali wrote:
Effectively none. APNIC has always served out unverified and obvious garbage from their whois servers.
And they are different from every other RIR in this respect how? Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-09-24, at 00.18, Joe Abley wrote:
On 23 Sep 2004, at 18:06, Matt Ghali wrote:
Effectively none. APNIC has always served out unverified and obvious garbage from their whois servers.
And they are different from every other RIR in this respect how?
...or IANA... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQVRzf6arNKXTPFCVEQJVDQCfYo4ZSyj7ijSO6odKaHvj0Jj6a4QAn0By MnesyKtas9ePPbPTMEV/ABUD =ExFG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Joe Abley -
Kurt Erik Lindqvist -
Matt Ghali