Besides, what sort of "dumb SMTP client" did you have in mind? Formmail scripts? Worms? Outlook Express? I can't say I'd miss mail from any of those.
Pot, kettle... Yours seem to have come via a train wreck of mua/mta's
From owner-nanog@merit.edu Fri Sep 30 08:42:11 2005 Delivered-To: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Delivered-To: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu Delivered-To: nanog@segue.merit.edu Delivered-To: nanog@nanog.org To: nanog@nanog.org Path: not-for-mail From: abuse@cabal.org.uk (Peter) Newsgroups: newsgate.nanog Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: cabal.org.uk listgate, Warwickshire, UK Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: dopiaza.cabal.org.uk X-Trace: dopiaza.cabal.org.uk 1128066086 12308 82.71.81.27 (30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dopiaza.cabal.org.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: abuse@dopiaza.cabal.org.uk (Peter) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.71.81.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: news@cabal.org.uk X-Spam-Hammy-Tokens: 0.000-+--H*F:U*abuse, 0.000-+--HX-Complaints-To:sk:usenet@, 0.000-+--H*M:cabal, 0.000-+--H*M:dopiaza, 0.000-+--H*r:news X-Spam-Bayes-Score: 0.0000 X-Spam-Spammy-Tokens: 0.994-8--formmail, 0.993-+--MAIL, 0.954-+--H*r:sk:punt-1., 0.938-+--H*Ad:D*org.uk, 0.927-+--H*Ad:D*uk X-Spam-Score-Description: * 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO * -1.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: Weird DNS issues for domains X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on punt-1.mooli.org.uk) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
spam and virus rating on outgoing is pointless nobody in their right mind is going to use them.
Path: not-for-mail
I agree, all that nntp stuff is pointless too brandon
On Friday 30 Sep 2005 9:37 am, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
spam and virus rating on outgoing is pointless nobody in their right mind is going to use them.
Whilst I think it is silly to do. Why not drop emails that claim to be viruses or spam? Of course why anyone would allow their servers to send such is another question. It would be silly to believe things that said "I'm not spam", but the opposite doesn't necessary apply.
participants (2)
-
Brandon Butterworth
-
Simon Waters