RE: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
(Taking this back on list for people to critique as they please.)
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 21:50:39 -0700 From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
[ snip ]
The problem with these other billing methods is primarily that they fail to reward people for taking effort to smooth out their usage. If my customers can do their bulk transfers off-peak, I'd like to reward them for it. That way they save me money.
People would probably balk at the complexity and variability, but I've contemplated a two-stage billing model... Have the base rate determined purely by traffic volume, i.e. GB/mo. Now apply an adjustment factor based on x = (95th / mean). x = 1.00 is perfectly flat; give substantial discount x = 1.50 is a moderate sine wave; consider this typical T-3 x = 2.50 is a typical T-1 x = 1.00 to 1.249# --> 25% off x = 1.25 to 1.399# --> 10% off x = 1.40 to 1.799# --> standard rate x = 1.80 to 2.499# --> 10% surcharge x = 2.50 up ---------> 25% surcharge and so on. I'd need to look at numbers, so don't take the above as the right mix, but you get the idea. Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (1)
-
E.B. Dreger