http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020605/200206051047000419_1.html ========================================================== Chris Candreva -- chris@westnet.com -- (914) 967-7816 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
DH> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:09:56 -0700 (PDT) DH> From: Dan Hollis DH> now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence DH> and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how DH> they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger DH> & better company. Heh. What I want to see is someone doing that in response to a Chapter 7 filing. ;-) Sounds silly, but I stood corrected by many people when I said "that'll be the day" that IWFs freak out over unreachables... Hmmmm. Another post that keeps me in the "prolific posters" list, yet does not help my standing in the "useful contribution" department. Back to my corner I go. -- Eddy Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.
I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and rapidly approaching apathy. - James
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company. I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and rapidly approaching apathy.
as our sisters and brothers lose jobs, i doubt either meanness or apathy are appropriate. do not tempt the fates. randy
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.
I'm certainly a lot less worried than I would be if it was another form of bankruptcy. Chapter 11 is a reorg, typically. I won't say it's *good* for the company - and there are too many telecomm firms filing bankruptcy these days anyhow. It might not be the end of the world. -- Steve Sobol, CTO JustThe.net LLC, Mentor On The Lake, OH 888.480.4NET - I do my best work with one of my cockatiels sitting on each shoulder - 6/4/02:A USA TODAY poll found that 80% of Catholics advocated a zero-tolerance stance towards abusive priests. The fact that 20% didn't, scares me...
participants (7)
-
Christopher X. Candreva -
Dan Hollis -
E.B. Dreger -
Grant A. Kirkwood -
James -
Randy Bush -
Steven J. Sobol