Re: Question about subnetting /24's
welcome to nanog, scott. while your question actually contained more technical, networking related material than most anything posted here, you'll get blasted for it none the less. see, most people here just magically aquired all this useful information and never had to ask anyone for help. now if you'd asked about the weather, or posted a note about how much you hate spam, or better yet why spam is ok, that seems to be relevant to nanog, or maybe michael dillon's physical build, or his karate belts, or... well you get the point. it's safe to post to nanog once you've read the charter, lurked for 12 months, absorbed each individual's variation of what's ok to post and what's not.... actually, forget it, buy a book. -brett
it's safe to post to nanog once you've read the charter, lurked for 12 months, absorbed each individual's variation of what's ok to post and what's not.... actually, forget it, buy a book.
-brett
and how to appease the nanog OAPP (operational applicability posting police). (and michael, you might also look into RFC 1878 for vlsm options and RFC 1122/23 for in-depth detail on the permutations on the appropriate values for broadcast and the subtle distinctions between all-ones and subnet-ones) --bill
participants (2)
-
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
-
Brett_Watson@enron.net