--- brandon.galbraith@gmail.com wrote: From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're gear just works. --------------------------------------------------- Unless it's the ERX series. Blech, it puts a bad taste in my mouth just writing the acronym ERX. Thank $deity that I don't have to work on those anymore... scott
You seem to have accidentally put an 'R' between your E and X ;) On 9/14/2011 4:05 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- brandon.galbraith@gmail.com wrote: From: Brandon Galbraith<brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're gear just works. ---------------------------------------------------
Unless it's the ERX series. Blech, it puts a bad taste in my mouth just writing the acronym ERX. Thank $deity that I don't have to work on those anymore...
scott
Well... Seems to be popping up on global NOG lists today. When you're already in trouble with the wife you go have a beer with your mates. This campaign got all of you to stop talking about NAT444 and focused on talking about Cisco and Juniper gear. Hell, if I put my tinfoil hat on, I'd say this was a joint venture by both vendors to get you all to focus on their kit and stop looking at other brands or talking about technology standards. How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site? * Does Juniper break promises? * Does Cisco break them? * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper? * What is the best technology for each company? * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution? ...I could go on... It's 9:20am here and I woke up to a flurry of the worlds leading IP people talking about Cisco and Juniper - To: <TheMarketingGuysFromCiscoJuniper> From: <OtherBrandUser> Subject: Global brand awareness Marketing campaign ---------------------------------------------------- Body: Job well done. D On 15/09/2011 9:05 a.m., Scott Weeks wrote:
--- brandon.galbraith@gmail.com wrote: From: Brandon Galbraith<brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're gear just works. ---------------------------------------------------
Unless it's the ERX series. Blech, it puts a bad taste in my mouth just writing the acronym ERX. Thank $deity that I don't have to work on those anymore...
scott
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises?
Yes.
* Does Cisco break them?
Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company?
Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
Yes, but I can't afford it. Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444? :) :) :) -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
On 15/09/2011 9:46 a.m., Leo Bicknell wrote:
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444?
Clearly some hate it enough to go to the trouble of making a 'we think they suck' web site in an attempt to draw readers in a different direction. Now with respect to your list... I'm sure there will be many that will be quite interested to see it, so Monday? :) Beer D
On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site? Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises? Yes.
* Does Cisco break them? Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper? It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company? Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution? Yes, but I can't afford it.
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444?
:) :) :)
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;) Sent from my iPhone On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <james@freedomnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site? Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises? Yes.
* Does Cisco break them? Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper? It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company? Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution? Yes, but I can't afford it.
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444?
:) :) :)
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6. -- Leigh Porter On 15 Sep 2011, at 00:37, "Mark Gauvin" <MGauvin@dryden.ca> wrote:
Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <james@freedomnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site? Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises? Yes.
* Does Cisco break them? Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper? It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company? Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution? Yes, but I can't afford it.
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444?
:) :) :)
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
That will either be because you exceeded your port count or the RTSP ALG is broken. -- Leigh Porter On 15 Sep 2011, at 07:48, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:36:42 -0000, Leigh Porter said:
I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6.
In NAT444, no one can hear you scream....
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
participants (9)
-
Don Gould -
James Jones -
Joel jaeggli -
Leigh Porter -
Leo Bicknell -
Mark Gauvin -
Michael Hare -
Scott Weeks -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu