RE: Cogent move without renumbering
Is it reasonable to think that numerous /24's from L3's IP space could be reassigned elsewhere without causing significant trouble for L3 and others? Even if it could work, what would be the justification for taking L3's property?
Depending upon the circumstance, yes: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg01880.html
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Is it reasonable to think that numerous /24's from L3's IP space could be reassigned elsewhere without causing significant trouble for L3 and others? Even if it could work, what would be the justification for taking L3's property?
Depending upon the circumstance, yes:
I think that is not entirely correct comparison. Original poster did not not say that the current L3 customers would entirely leave L3, but that he asked if they could do something to get other type of connectivity if they have L3 ip space. The answer is that if they have /24 or longer and have router then they can turn on BGP and announce that /24 both to L3 and to another ISP and in this way have full connectivity. This would not be an attempt to take ip ip space away from L3. But this is not something they could do within couple days if they do not run BGP and do not have ASN (takes at least a week to get it from ARIN). -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william@elan.net
(if i may shorten this a bit...) Q can an "end user" take non portable ip's with them to another service provider? --- "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net> wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote: Depending upon the circumstance, yes:
here is SOME of the raw data http://e-gerbil.net/ras/nac-case/ SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. MRS-C-87-04 JUNE 25, 2004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civil Action No. 04-cv-2831 June 24, 2004 perhaps folowups should be set to A.S.H.K
participants (4)
-
Charles Cala -
Elmar K. Bins -
Hannigan, Martin -
william(at)elan.net