Facebook down!! Alert!
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA. ~SmithwaySecurity Sent from my iPhone
Down , down, down in NYC. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area....
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith <james@smithwaysecurity.com
wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this. On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon" <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area....
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith <james@smithwaysecurity.com>wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this.
On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon" <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area....
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith <james@smithwaysecurity.com wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
I have to agree on this as well. I can understand when a service provider is having problems and people questioning it since that can affect many of us who depend on backbone connections, but sites like facebook and twitter being down should not be posted here but on the "sitesemployeeswastetimeon.org" [\sarcasm off] On 10/06/2010 02:20 PM, christian koch wrote:
+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali<zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this.
On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon"<mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area....
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith<james@smithwaysecurity.com wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Bret Clark wrote:
I have to agree on this as well. I can understand when a service provider is
you've forgotten that facebook (and indeed twitter too) are service providers that provide business-critical services. just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight outage. -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g. Zygna. So, net net a FB outage could be seen as a positive thing in the course of a work day. -matt On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM, david raistrick <drais@icantclick.org> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Bret Clark wrote:
I have to agree on this as well. I can understand when a service provider is
you've forgotten that facebook (and indeed twitter too) are service providers that provide business-critical services.
just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight outage.
-- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Matt Baldwin wrote:
I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g.
Perhaps, then, we should instead be discussing the business benefits of blocking facebook so companies can regain productivity? -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
OpenDNS is my favorite for blocking things like FB and all sorts of other productivity killers. The information in this email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the email and all of its attachments From: david raistrick [mailto:drais@icantclick.org] Sent: Wed 10/6/2010 3:34 PM To: Matt Baldwin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Matt Baldwin wrote:
I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g.
Perhaps, then, we should instead be discussing the business benefits of blocking facebook so companies can regain productivity? -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight outage.
IMO which may be way off base, when akamai goes off the air, people lose potential sales/revenue. when facebook goes off the air, a greater number of companies become more efficient than those who suffer productivity loss. yes, it is worth mention, but else where, like twitter or on your wall. -g
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Greg Whynott wrote:
just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight outage.
IMO which may be way off base, when akamai goes off the air, people lose potential sales/revenue. when facebook goes off the air, a greater number of companies become more efficient than those who suffer productivity loss.
so the majority defines operational now, huh? wow. nice to know that network service providers outnumber other companies these days... (of course, those service providers also make their money from facebook consumers....) -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
On 10/6/2010 4:33 PM, david raistrick wrote:
so the majority defines operational now, huh? wow. nice to know that network service providers outnumber other companies these days... (of course, those service providers also make their money from facebook consumers....)
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power loss at a peering point, DoS attack. Please let's end this thread (And others of its ilk here and now).
Passes Andrew the shotgun... Please kill all FB threads with it. :) The only thing I noticed being down last night is battle.net ;). Guess you know where my priorities are. Lol -Rg -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Kirch [mailto:trelane@trelane.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:39 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On 10/6/2010 4:33 PM, david raistrick wrote:
so the majority defines operational now, huh? wow. nice to know that network service providers outnumber other companies these days... (of course, those service providers also make their money from facebook consumers....)
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power loss at a peering point, DoS attack. Please let's end this thread (And others of its ilk here and now).
-----Original Message----- From: Guerra, Ruben [mailto:Ruben.Guerra@arrisi.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:47 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Facebook down!! Alert!
Passes Andrew the shotgun... Please kill all FB threads with it. :)
The only thing I noticed being down last night is battle.net ;). Guess you know where my priorities are. Lol
-Rg
Minecraft.net keeps going down, maybe we should start a thread about that, too! Nathan
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote:
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power
not a mission critical internet resource -to you- -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, david raistrick wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote:
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power
not a mission critical internet resource -to you-
to be clear, I could give a damn about if we talk about this on nanog or not. (and I agree that outages is the right place to announce outages, and outage-discuss to discuss them). my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what nanog is but someday will) services. without them, my teams can't work and my employeer loses signiicant figures of revenue per day. so facebook is very much operationally relevant for my network, and that these mixed content/service providers will be more and more relevant as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day pure service. -- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
On 10/6/2010 5:05 PM, david raistrick wrote:
to be clear, I could give a damn about if we talk about this on nanog or not. (and I agree that outages is the right place to announce outages, and outage-discuss to discuss them).
my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what nanog is but someday will) services. without them, my teams can't work and my employeer loses signiicant figures of revenue per day.
so facebook is very much operationally relevant for my network, and that these mixed content/service providers will be more and more relevant as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day pure service.
My company buys firearms, so I am going to start posting to nanog every time my service providers go down (Springfield Armory, Rock River Arms, Volkmann Custom, and Benelli). Certainly they're a website, but without that website I can't order the firearms which costs me significant figures of revenue per day. Perhaps your company buys widgets of some sort? That is not however a core networking issue. Facebook outages may be important to your company, and I do some business on there as well, but NANOG is not a list where non-bandwidth vendor outages should be reported. (unless you like guns too!) Andrew
On 06/10/10 17:05 -0400, david raistrick wrote:
my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what nanog is but someday will) services. without them, my teams can't work and my employeer loses signiicant figures of revenue per day.
Why can't your teams work? Do they have email? I'm trying to imagine what operational scenarios are involved between the technical staff in a company that depend on Facebook being up, unless you're working for Facebook. Even if I were not email inclined, I'd set up a local XMPP server do to my communication.
so facebook is very much operationally relevant for my network, and that these mixed content/service providers will be more and more relevant as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day pure service.
How we deal with it is to create a viable distributed version of it. -- Dan White
The only way in which I can see facebook as required for operations is when one is hosting apps that must interact with the facbook API. Facebook is a site we keep an eye on from our NOC simply because it is important to a lot our larger transit customers due to them having apps that require facebook API access. We tend to also get calls from the .edu sites we service when it has outages. That being said, facebook outages are not really an internal problem for us and it would seem odd to trust bussness proccesses to free social network site. John / AS11404 -----Original Message----- From: Dan White [mailto:dwhite@olp.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:24 PM To: david raistrick Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On 06/10/10 17:05 -0400, david raistrick wrote:
my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what nanog is but someday will) services. without them, my teams can't work and my employeer loses signiicant figures of revenue per day.
Why can't your teams work? Do they have email? I'm trying to imagine what operational scenarios are involved between the technical staff in a company that depend on Facebook being up, unless you're working for Facebook. Even if I were not email inclined, I'd set up a local XMPP server do to my communication.
so facebook is very much operationally relevant for my network, and that these mixed content/service providers will be more and more relevant as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day pure service.
How we deal with it is to create a viable distributed version of it. -- Dan White
----- Original Message -----
From: "david raistrick" <drais@icantclick.org> To: "Andrew Kirch" <trelane@trelane.net> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:05:10 PM Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, david raistrick wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote:
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power
not a mission critical internet resource -to you-
to be clear, I could give a damn about if we talk about this on nanog or not. (and I agree that outages is the right place to announce outages, and outage-discuss to discuss them).
my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what nanog is but someday will) services. without them, my teams can't work and my employeer loses signiicant figures of revenue per day.
so facebook is very much operationally relevant for my network, and that these mixed content/service providers will be more and more relevant as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day pure service.
This thread proves too me yet again that nanog is the internets equivalent of a giant panty raid. This isn't the outages list & I am rather annoyed that we must discuss junk social media sites such as facebook. Just because you are panicing does not mean that the thousands of people on this list give a flying rats ass that facebook is down! Can we please discuss relevant topics such as running networks? (for instance NOT @#$@#$ing FACEBOOK!) This list over the last year has just gone soo far downhill that I am most likely going to unsubscribe from it as I don't get any technical benefit from the garbage that is discussed on this list 99.999999999999999% of the time. --Tammy -- Tammy A Wisdom The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org ****************************************************************************** Disclaimer: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. ******************************************************************************
Giant Panty Raid. Now I know what I'll be calling my weekend/overnight shifts. Who says being a Network Engineer can't be fun? Q On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom <tammy-lists@wiztech.biz>wrote:
This thread proves too me yet again that nanog is the internets equivalent of a giant panty raid. This isn't the outages list & I am rather annoyed that we must discuss junk social media sites such as facebook. Just because you are panicing does not mean that the thousands of people on this list give a flying rats ass that facebook is down! Can we please discuss relevant topics such as running networks? (for instance NOT @#$@#$ing FACEBOOK!) This list over the last year has just gone soo far downhill that I am most likely going to unsubscribe from it as I don't get any technical benefit from the garbage that is discussed on this list 99.999999999999999% of the time.
--Tammy
On 10/06/2010 06:08 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
This thread proves too me yet again that nanog is the internets equivalent of a giant panty raid. This isn't the outages list& I am rather annoyed that we must discuss junk social media sites such as facebook. Just because you are panicing does not mean that the thousands of people on this list give a flying rats ass that facebook is down! Can we please discuss relevant topics such as running networks? (for instance NOT @#$@#$ing FACEBOOK!) This list over the last year has just gone soo far downhill that I am most likely going to unsubscribe from it as I don't get any technical benefit from the garbage that is discussed on this list 99.999999999999999% of the time.
--Tammy
I've always looked at the nanog list representing issues up to layer 4 of the OSI model; mostly layer 3/4. Maybe a new mailing list could be made called the North American Network Applications Group (nanag)...there might be a pun there :). Bret
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bret Clark" <bclark@spectraaccess.com> I've always looked at the nanog list representing issues up to layer 4 of the OSI model; mostly layer 3/4. Maybe a new mailing list could be made called the North American Network Applications Group (nanag)...there might be a pun there :).
Perhaps, but Facebook being down is usually a "Layer 8" issue. (Layer 8 being the Human involved ;)
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:39:03 EDT, Andrew Kirch said:
No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power loss at a peering point, DoS attack.
Yes, but anytime something spikes the number of calls at my help desk, that *is* an operational issue, even if it's something stupid in the eyes of the savvy network engineers that hang out here...
Especially for Facebook alerts.. You are propagating a false perception that everyone cares. -g On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:20 PM, christian koch wrote:
+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this.
On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon" <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area....
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith <james@smithwaysecurity.com wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
Hello, Is www.lisp4.facebook.com working for places where www.facebook.com is down? Damien Saucez On 06 Oct 2010, at 06:47, Michiel Muhlenbaumer wrote:
Hi James,
On 6 okt 2010, at 06:44, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
No reason to panic over here (.nl)
--- Michiel Muhlenbaumer Atrato IP Networks
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com looks like it isn't just you .. Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night of hacking awaits me ... -Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon) Key ID: 0x370D752C Please send all spam to my main address, root@localhost
Works fine here, Northern Colorado. -- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov <mailto:strizhov@cs.colostate.edu> On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com
looks like it isn't just you ..
Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night of hacking awaits me ...
-Patrick
-- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon) Key ID: 0x370D752C
Please send all spam to my main address, root@localhost
Still up here in Massachusetts over v4 and v6. Since 11:45am (that is PST, I believe) there is still an ongoing issue with "real-time updates" according to the Live Status page. http://developers.facebook.com/live_status Visiting that page just now, the latest API response time graphs are definitely indicative of what looks like serious new problems. Also, Facebook is hosting an event Wednesday where they're rumored to be rolling out a large update-- coincidence?!? http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/05/facebook-redesign-lockdown/ -Matt Dodd On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Mikhail Strizhov wrote:
Works fine here, Northern Colorado.
-- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov
<mailto:strizhov@cs.colostate.edu>
On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com
looks like it isn't just you ..
Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night of hacking awaits me ...
-Patrick
-- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon) Key ID: 0x370D752C
Please send all spam to my main address, root@localhost
Yeah it's back. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Mikhail Strizhov <strizhov@cs.colostate.edu
wrote:
Works fine here, Northern Colorado.
-- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov
<mailto:strizhov@cs.colostate.edu>
On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is
down. Please confirm in the USA.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com
looks like it isn't just you ..
Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night of hacking awaits me ...
-Patrick
-- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon <http://www.inoc.net/%7Edoon>) Key ID: 0x370D752C
Please send all spam to my main address, root@localhost
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-) On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" <james@smithwaysecurity.com> wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
Seems to be working just fine here in Toronto. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Mark Hofman <mhofman@shearwater.com.au>wrote:
Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-)
On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" <james@smithwaysecurity.com> wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
-- James Smith
It's back up. There goes that short burst of productivity. On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Mark Hofman wrote:
Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-)
On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" <james@smithwaysecurity.com> wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
From: "Mark" <mark@edgewire.sg> It's back up. There goes that short burst of productivity.
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Mark Hofman wrote:
Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-)
The irony is that the short burst of productivity was spent troubleshooting if Facebook was up or down.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Mark Hofman wrote:
Guess productivity will go up ;-)
You'd think so, but my experience is that when Facebook goes down the whole company will leave their desks and go to the networking people to get them to fix the Facebook. And they won't leave until Facebook is back. --------- typedef struct me_s { char name[] = { "Thomas Habets" }; char email[] = { "thomas@habets.pp.se" }; char kernel[] = { "Linux" }; char *pgpKey[] = { "http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt" }; char pgp[] = { "A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854" }; char coolcmd[] = { "echo '. ./_&. ./_'>_;. ./_" }; } me_t;
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
Down from FL...but like last time, www.lisp4.facebook.com works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
We need "Alert" and ! in the subject? seriously? Sorry, but I don't see a reason to get all excited. FB is down, omg, alert the media. geez -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMrAOfAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqa2sP/AuUU0WnM4UUtAO3mazyRPIa gJ/xuguEgYWNbl7j/EZgHEu7fSYgkbo+Y/H+T2F5nl0PO3UqJz5sjyfD654OSy0h FAERgpR2syfRFM17EaLai4VgHsiVdm82Fzqs8xXwumu9OVfQAbk/eWsg6d0wOzp8 cuO7OUmb06i66VHbmWrSSJKmJKkhYvxf89o3NbPI6i0eIqr0wADJLIRbDQLLTt1i YnCj1urxClGnw9ChoCe0meNITllKx9nluzKEDy6P1eRWxTMGCn9xOnWlKHW2/6Rs sW/klZeOFxLDFEkufNLPr6w9vWxee648j0fjkCU6PGn6GRxaS6Qq0je1e/15f8cI MlfA1CCO/hNvSA07EBbpz9th2wyx69ninnv7Y3mjly//YB0EY/9H2j21wCDsDoJ4 SY/ttYOKQEZ3XoTAKa0RLzRmkR/GQwVsnGUfa//kA1Msf541VG8i98dYF6tpqFVt RJ0SDEHv53XSP+tuT4HdCyj8BtgwqIQTlughqynPM74kbYc6jYrZ6mxHxfhJkeXD wsYoJmHVcUgg/WKsa0eGk7sPhHEgR1alW5KnBYAjBtsStO9sLmESSTculvEQ7VXS OvuYUTfqgl3mkRtW0ttJvB/b5VvCQ70eUIkcmRUEvrX30WJldjupFxkyCaJtB3s4 Cq0MnisvbZZcpLoAJ0Qp =HLWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 10/5/10 10:05 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
We need "Alert" and ! in the subject? seriously? Sorry, but I don't see a reason to get all excited. FB is down, omg, alert the media. geez
Correction, that's "alert" and a total of three exclamation points. Not a peep on outages. ~Seth
participants (31)
-
Adcock, Matt [HISNA] -
Andrew Kirch -
Bret Clark -
christian koch -
Damien Saucez -
Dan White -
david raistrick -
Greg Whynott -
Guerra, Ruben -
James Smith -
James Smith -
Jeff Harper -
John van Oppen -
Joly MacFie -
Jon Lewis -
Larry Brower -
Mark -
Mark Hofman -
Matt Baldwin -
Matthew Dodd -
Michiel Muhlenbaumer -
Mike Lyon -
Mikhail Strizhov -
Nathan Eisenberg -
Patrick Muldoon -
Quinn Kuzmich -
Seth Mattinen -
Tammy A. Wisdom -
Thomas Habets -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu -
Zaid Ali