On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:14:53PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
So, what you're saying is that I should tell all the folks that want to peer via ATM at CMH-IX (which supports 10/100/GE at this time) that they should get bent or get GigE, right?
THANK YOU!
I had to go google search for this one, and I presume you mean http://www.cmh-ix.net/. If so, it's a good thing the operators made the wise decision to support GigE, otherwise they couldn't possibly expect to meet demand. :-)
In this case, perhaps an 8-port Linksys hub would be more appropriate for their needs. :P -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
After I long search, I can not find any exchange point operated by Richard "unhealthy fascination with gerbils" Steenbergen. Until you build an exchange point yourself, don't belittle ours. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:14:53PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
So, what you're saying is that I should tell all the folks that want to peer via ATM at CMH-IX (which supports 10/100/GE at this time) that they should get bent or get GigE, right?
THANK YOU!
I had to go google search for this one, and I presume you mean http://www.cmh-ix.net/. If so, it's a good thing the operators made the wise decision to support GigE, otherwise they couldn't possibly expect to meet demand. :-)
In this case, perhaps an 8-port Linksys hub would be more appropriate for their needs. :P
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
traceroute to enraged.informationwave.net (216.74.64.82) from Stats.CMH-IX.Net, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 CORE-0-POS-GE-3-1000M.CMH.ENTERZONE.NET (209.41.244.1) 0.893 ms 0.903 ms 0.764 ms 2 64.241.88.6 (64.241.88.6) 16.529 ms 18.139 ms 2048.219 ms 3 atm8-0-093.CR-2.uschcg.savvis.net (64.241.88.65) 3441.788 ms 16.358 ms 16.449 ms What's POS-GE? John Fraizer wrote:
After I long search, I can not find any exchange point operated by Richard "unhealthy fascination with gerbils" Steenbergen.
Until you build an exchange point yourself, don't belittle ours.
--- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:14:53PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
So, what you're saying is that I should tell all the folks that want to peer via ATM at CMH-IX (which supports 10/100/GE at this time) that they should get bent or get GigE, right?
THANK YOU!
I had to go google search for this one, and I presume you mean http://www.cmh-ix.net/. If so, it's a good thing the operators made the wise decision to support GigE, otherwise they couldn't possibly expect to meet demand. :-)
In this case, perhaps an 8-port Linksys hub would be more appropriate for their needs. :P
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
-- Virtual Development Incorporated http://www.vdi.net Omachonu Ogali missnglnk@vdi.net Network Engineer (973) 815-2799
That is the position in the router. POS stands for position in that description. On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
traceroute to enraged.informationwave.net (216.74.64.82) from Stats.CMH-IX.Net, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 CORE-0-POS-GE-3-1000M.CMH.ENTERZONE.NET (209.41.244.1) 0.893 ms 0.903 ms 0.764 ms 2 64.241.88.6 (64.241.88.6) 16.529 ms 18.139 ms 2048.219 ms 3 atm8-0-093.CR-2.uschcg.savvis.net (64.241.88.65) 3441.788 ms 16.358 ms 16.449 ms
What's POS-GE?
John Fraizer wrote:
After I long search, I can not find any exchange point operated by Richard "unhealthy fascination with gerbils" Steenbergen.
Until you build an exchange point yourself, don't belittle ours.
--- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:14:53PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
So, what you're saying is that I should tell all the folks that want to peer via ATM at CMH-IX (which supports 10/100/GE at this time) that they should get bent or get GigE, right?
THANK YOU!
I had to go google search for this one, and I presume you mean http://www.cmh-ix.net/. If so, it's a good thing the operators made the wise decision to support GigE, otherwise they couldn't possibly expect to meet demand. :-)
In this case, perhaps an 8-port Linksys hub would be more appropriate for their needs. :P
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
-- Virtual Development Incorporated http://www.vdi.net Omachonu Ogali missnglnk@vdi.net Network Engineer (973) 815-2799
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:44:55AM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
Until you build an exchange point yourself, don't belittle ours.
Now that's a ridiculous standard. By that logic, one couldn't say "the 1995 Ford Aspire sucks" unless one has built a car.
participants (4)
-
John Fraizer -
Omachonu Ogali -
Richard A. Steenbergen -
Shawn McMahon