RFI: Intrusion Detection Systems
My apologies to anyone that receives duplicates of this email stemming from it being cross posted. I have been asked to investigate an Intrusion Detection/Prevention System. Could anyone that has knowledge of the following products give me the good, bad or the ugly concerning them. Reply to myself online or off line If anyone would like a summary of the results please do not hesitate to ask. NIDS: Cisco Intrusion Detection Sensors Version 4.x 4235, 4250 NAI Intrusion Prevention Sensors IntruShield 2600, 4000 (IntruVert) HIPS: Cisco Security Agent Entercept Management Systems: Cisco VMS - VPN/Security Management System NAI: ISM Security Management System. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Kim
kgraham@rogers.com writes on 11/13/2003 5:35 AM:
My apologies to anyone that receives duplicates of this email stemming from it being cross posted.
There was a recent network computing article that evaluated quite a lot of these. However, I'd suggest that you avoid NAI / Norton stuff for IDSs .. -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
At 03:29 AM 11/13/2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
kgraham@rogers.com writes on 11/13/2003 5:35 AM:
My apologies to anyone that receives duplicates of this email stemming from it being cross posted.
There was a recent network computing article that evaluated quite a lot of these. However, I'd suggest that you avoid NAI / Norton stuff for IDSs ..
See these articles, written in 2002: http://www.nwfusion.com/techinsider/2002/0624security.html http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/0916testerschoice.html and in 2003: http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/1013idsrev.html jc -- I do not need or want cc'd copies of replies to the list. Please reply to the list or to me (whichever you prefer), but not both.
participants (3)
-
JC Dill -
kgraham＠rogers.com -
Suresh Ramasubramanian