Is anyone else having trouble recently with Internic garbling domain templates and then sending them back as invalid? Many of the lines come back with more .'s than they were sent in with, and they seem to consistently be doing variations on the following:
Secondary Name Server(s) 8a. Secondary Server Hostname.......:jabba.tlh.fdt.net 8b. Secondary Server Netaddress.....:199.44...96.16
It didn't have the extra .'s in the IP address any of the 4 times we submitted this particular domain registration. Usually, it comes back with one extra in the IP...this last one had a bonus of 2 extra. I guess when they decided to lower the fee from $50 to $35, they decided to break their automated system so they could justify raising it back to $50 so they can hire more staff to unbreak things. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
Maybe NSI is just unhappy about how they were portrayed in the latest Wired article....;) On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble recently with Internic garbling domain templates and then sending them back as invalid? Many of the lines come back with more .'s than they were sent in with, and they seem to consistently be doing variations on the following:
Secondary Name Server(s) 8a. Secondary Server Hostname.......:jabba.tlh.fdt.net 8b. Secondary Server Netaddress.....:199.44...96.16
It didn't have the extra .'s in the IP address any of the 4 times we submitted this particular domain registration. Usually, it comes back with one extra in the IP...this last one had a bonus of 2 extra.
I guess when they decided to lower the fee from $50 to $35, they decided to break their automated system so they could justify raising it back to $50 so they can hire more staff to unbreak things. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
I'm still shocked that it took 4 days to motify my NIC Handle. Moe. On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:
Maybe NSI is just unhappy about how they were portrayed in the latest Wired article....;)
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble recently with Internic garbling domain templates and then sending them back as invalid? Many of the lines come back with more .'s than they were sent in with, and they seem to consistently be doing variations on the following:
Secondary Name Server(s) 8a. Secondary Server Hostname.......:jabba.tlh.fdt.net 8b. Secondary Server Netaddress.....:199.44...96.16
It didn't have the extra .'s in the IP address any of the 4 times we submitted this particular domain registration. Usually, it comes back with one extra in the IP...this last one had a bonus of 2 extra.
I guess when they decided to lower the fee from $50 to $35, they decided to break their automated system so they could justify raising it back to $50 so they can hire more staff to unbreak things. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
participants (3)
-
Fox Mulder -
Jon Lewis -
Marc Hurst