Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking]
On 10/7/2014 22:28, Roy wrote:
On 10/7/2014 7:34 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 10/7/2014 20:59, Roy wrote:
The SF Bay Area Rapid Transits System) turned off cellphones in 2011.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/BART-admits-halting-cell-service-to-stop-...
and the FCC emphasis that future actions "recognizes that any interruption of cell phone service poses serious risks to public safety"
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/BART-cell-phone-shutdown-rules-adopted...
I see that as a fundamentally very different mater.
If I understand, they turned off repeaters ("towers") that they owned and provided, in tunnels and other structures they owned--equipment that they were under no obligation whatever to provide.
A reaction to "bright" marketing ideas that had not been thought-through.
BART's equipment was licensed by the FCC with a main reason being 911 access.
OK--not a Marketing idea, maybe. But still, all the options are in BART's hands--they have emergency phones and people everywhere. The cell service is not a requirement placed upon them, I am pretty sure. -- The unique Characteristics of System Administrators: The fact that they are infallible; and, The fact that they learn from their mistakes. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:10:15 -0500, Larry Sheldon said:
The cell service is not a requirement placed upon them, I am pretty sure.
However, once having chosen to provide it, and thus create an expectation that cellular E911 is available, they're obligated to carry through on that.
participants (2)
-
Larry Sheldon
-
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu