Re: Agenda for next NANOG - interest in domain names?
At 02:22 PM 08/31/96 -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
Is there any interest in a presentation explaining: - the latest changes in NSI's flawed domain name trademark policy, - the never-ending risk of loss of a domain name (with only 30 days' warning) that any domain name owner faces even if they aren't infringing anybody's trademarks, - the very few steps that a domain name owner can take to reduce the risk of loss of a domain name.
Personally, I suspect the FNCAC is the more appropriate forum for public complaints about NSI's activities under their cooperative aggreement. The FNCAC usually meets sometime around October too. Policy and Politics are their specialty.
*BUT* since NSI has made presentations at NANOG about their domain dispute policy in the past, I suppose its only fair to hear from the loyal opposition.
I am unaware of whether NSI is on the agenda for the October NANOG meeting. But if it is, then I do urge those who would attend NSI's presentation to seek out the domain name owner's point of view as well. NSI's position is essentially adversarial to that of the domain name owners, a point that NSI doesn't disclose in its presentations.
I would ask any such presentation be time-limited, the audience agrees to sit quietly in their seats, and scheduled as the last thing in the day, so the rest of us can adjourn to the bar early.
Ideally the NSI and domain-name-owner-side presentations would be back-to-back. End of the day is fine with me. Carl Oppedahl
Ideally the NSI and domain-name-owner-side presentations would be back-to-back. End of the day is fine with me.
Network operators care about a lot of things but domain name politics and economics aren't among them. Prefix politics matter because NANOG consists almost entirely of people who are allocating prefixes (either at the top or in the middle somewhere) or who need to consume a lot of them in order to stay in business. Domain names are allocated more or less once, are not subdivided, and are registered and consumed by end- users in an operator-independent ("portable") fashion. There are no consequences, good or evil, that befall operators as a result of NSI's domain name dispute policy. (Or rather, operators no more so than any- one else -- we might as well talk about ozone layer depletion.) Folks do not need to come to NANOG to learn more about domain name politics or to exchange ideas about how to make things better. This is just not a worthwhile topic for NANOG unless the agenda fails to be packed as tightly as it has been for the last year or two.
This seems like one of those special interest topics that could be scheduled for late in the afternoon of the second day. randy
participants (3)
-
Carl Oppedahl
-
Paul A Vixie
-
randy@psg.com