Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
30 Apr
2005
30 Apr
'05
11:32 p.m.
On 4/27/05, Jerry Pasker <info@n-connect.net> wrote:
It means 10 different things to 10 different people. The article was vague. "Security" could mean blocking a few ports, simple Proxy/NAT, blocking port 25 (or 139... or 53.. heh heh) or a thousand different things. There is a market for this, it's called "managed services."
Speaking of port 25 blocking for end users [note: not for transit feeds or raw pipes] - here's my take on it. http://www.circleid.com/article/1039_0_1_0_C/ --srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
7176
Age (days ago)
7176
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Suresh Ramasubramanian