http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010202/tc/email_microsoft_1.html Seems like an email test got out of hand. Saying it doesn't reflect any problem with Exchange. I would tend to question that...a backlog of mail should be able to be processed more quickly than that I would think...though I don't really know the severity of the situation, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now. FWIW, to the best of my knowledge, there is no relation between myself and the Scott McAdams quoted. (McAdams really isn't all that common of a name though, so I guess its possible) -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm@iglou.com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
You'd be suprised. When my company sends out newsletters, etc, the bounces alone are pretty taxing on the mail server. Yesterday alone I was seeing delays of 1, 2 hours -- last week a huge mailing delayed the mail gateways up to 4 hours. It also depends on what your relays are doing, too. If they're spamchecking and virus scanning, the backlog can get big, fast, when your mail server is suddenly hit with 4, 5, 6 times its normal volume. Most people dont plan for influxes like that because, well, they generally don't happen unless something is really wrong. On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:13:56AM -0500, Jeff Mcadams wrote:
...a backlog of mail should be able to be processed more quickly than that I would think...though I don't really know the severity of the situation, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.
-- i am jamie at arpa dot com .. and this is my .sig. core1.dns.microsoft.com# sho access-list 101 Extended IP access list 101 deny udp any any eq domain (874572345872345 matches)
participants (2)
-
jamie rishaw
-
Jeff Mcadams