Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sendingvs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)
--- joelja@bogus.com wrote: From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Scott Weeks wrote:
Ok, I hadn't thought of that. I was thinking of one company in a non-US country with some assets in the US (but most not) and being held to US regulations network-wide. How would you stop the traffic that was not following US regulations from hitting the US?
Ask ISPs with networks on both side of the US Canada border who have the candian government for a customer, they do it today. ---------------------------------------------- They stop the bits from flowing on one part of the ISP's network to the Canadian Government and not the other part? scott
Hi everyone, The Mailing List Committee would like to remind everyone that postings of a political nature are not considered operational. From the acceptable use policy [1]: 6. Postings of political, philosophical, and legal nature are prohibited. Please refrain from follow up posts on the subject in this thread. We encourage you to continue your conversation in a more appropriate forum. Kris Foster Mailing List Committee Chair [1] http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/
participants (2)
-
kris foster
-
Scott Weeks