There is no NSFNET AUP any longer, but, if you are NACRing nets to speak to AS 690, it makes sense to use the ANS AUP and the ansnet NACR. Steve R./Merit ==

From list-admin@merit.edu Wed May 3 17:38:23 1995 Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id RAA09146; Wed, 3 May 1995 17:38:18 -0400 Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.1.3]) by merit.edu (8.6.10/merit-2.0) with SMTP id RAA02650 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:51 -0400 Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA58255 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for nanog@merit.edu); Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400 Message-Id: <199505032104.AA58255@interlock.ans.net> Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400 From: Steve Heimlich <heimlich@ans.net> Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:40 -0400 To: smd@icp.net Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: PRDB Retirement next Monday, May 8 Status: R

Sean,

The one question I have about NACRs until 8 May is what text to put at the top of them.

Obviously the old NSFNET wording is no longer appropriate.

Sean.

My feeling on this is that ANS doesn't look at it, so you can replace it with XXXXXX if you like, or not if you don't, but I will let Merit have the last word on this. Steve