Yes, they are back. Strange, even through looking glasses all over the world they were not reachable for at least an hour ?! D. On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Gibson, Mark wrote:
i can see them
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Marquez-Klaka [mailto:dmk@marquez.de] Sent: 18 October 2002 10:56 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: www.lucent.com
Hello,
does someone know what happened to http://www.lucent.com ? Yesterday everything was fine, but now it seams like they are wiped out of the internet. No DNS resolution (unknown host ?!).
Daniel
-- This communication contains confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual/s and/or entity or entities to whom it was intended to be addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately, delete this communication from your system, and do not disclose its contents to any third party, or use its contents. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Orchestream Ltd or its group of companies unless otherwise specifically stated.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Daniel Marquez-Klaka wrote:
Yes, they are back. Strange, even through looking glasses all over the world they were not reachable for at least an hour ?!
1) Lucent had a flag-day for maintenance on their webserver? 2) Lucent did some vaccuuming of the internet? 3) Lucent had a real problem and have yet to say something 'publicly' about it? :) I prefer 2 though... more vaccuuming should be done, shut down the internet for 24 hours and clean out the bad packets/lost tokens/spam mail. :)
D.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Gibson, Mark wrote:
i can see them
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Marquez-Klaka [mailto:dmk@marquez.de] Sent: 18 October 2002 10:56 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: www.lucent.com
Hello,
does someone know what happened to http://www.lucent.com ? Yesterday everything was fine, but now it seams like they are wiped out of the internet. No DNS resolution (unknown host ?!).
Daniel
-- This communication contains confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual/s and/or entity or entities to whom it was intended to be addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately, delete this communication from your system, and do not disclose its contents to any third party, or use its contents. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Orchestream Ltd or its group of companies unless otherwise specifically stated.
DM> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:23:09 +0200 (CEST) DM> From: Daniel Marquez-Klaka DM> Strange, even through looking glasses all over the world DM> they were not reachable for at least an hour ?! If the routes are announced correctly and there are no routing disasters, then it's probably inappropriate for NANOG-L. (Think looooong spam threads.) http://www.nanog.org/faq Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
participants (3)
-
Christopher L. Morrow -
Daniel Marquez-Klaka -
E.B. Dreger