A NANOG25 Info Message: For those interested in the amount of bandwidth used at NANOG25. Utilization of the Hotel Router can be viewed at: http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/ ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world. -Randy
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Randy Neals wrote:
For those interested in the amount of bandwidth used at NANOG25. Utilization of the Hotel Router can be viewed at:
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/
ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
I see the beer rany dry about 0015? Bummer :-) -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages. On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Randy Neals wrote:
A NANOG25 Info Message:
For those interested in the amount of bandwidth used at NANOG25. Utilization of the Hotel Router can be viewed at:
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/
ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
-Randy
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not... If the issue is with meeting messages being on the main NANOG list, can I suggest setting up a seperate mailing list for NANOG meeting attendees, where non-operational content can be posted? Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676 Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart@bbc.co.uk Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/
Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not...
Considering the LARGE number of messages that are posted here that are truly non-operational (such as whether certain people have connectivity on their DSL line), I suspect that Susan was far more concerned with the slashdot effect of a bazillion people going to look at the bandwidth link (for the hotel router) that Randy had posted. I think you are reading too much into the original post.
If the issue is with meeting messages being on the main NANOG list, can I suggest setting up a seperate mailing list for NANOG meeting attendees, where non-operational content can be posted?
I hope not. I imagine that one of the niceties for those not attending is listening in on the exchanges. At least someone's having a good time. -- Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not...
If the issue is with meeting messages being on the main NANOG list, can I suggest setting up a seperate mailing list for NANOG meeting attendees, where non-operational content can be posted?
Something would be better than nothing. The meeting bater does hold some value.
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not...
If the issue is with meeting messages being on the main NANOG list, can I suggest setting up a seperate mailing list for NANOG meeting attendees, where non-operational content can be posted?
That was indeed the issue, and a separate list is a great idea. Thanks Simon.
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/ ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
cool! any idea why the flat 750k? multicast beacon? randy
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:29:55 -0700 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/ ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
cool!
any idea why the flat 750k? multicast beacon?
randy
Dear Randy; They are indeed sourcing a NLANR multicast beacon from 192.35.169.2 - their connectivity looks very good. The 750k seems to be all inbound beacon traffic. They are not sourcing outbound video yet. As for why the NLANR beacon takes 750 K, ask Bill Nickless. Each beacon sends 10 packets per second and, with 127 beacons now participating, it adds up. IMHO a rate of 1 packet per second would be sufficient, and would cut the beacon traffic down to a reasonable size. Regards Marshall Eubanks
participants (8)
-
Etaoin Shrdlu -
Marshall Eubanks -
Martin Hannigan -
measl＠mfn.org -
Randy Bush -
Randy Neals -
Simon Lockhart -
Susan Harris