I find this 1h35m lag on nanog-l to be quite in the way of quickly spreading news. Any chance of getting the list servers a bit more efficient? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Return-Path: <owner-nanog@merit.edu> Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8CMbw616482 for <swmike@swm.pp.se>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:37:58 +0200 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 2CD1891733; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:50:16 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 176219121F; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:12:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F9D91628 for <nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:01:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 26F4A5DD93; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:01:56 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: nanog@merit.org Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [195.54.133.5]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C8F5DD91 for <nanog@merit.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:01:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (swmike@localhost) by uplift.swm.pp.se (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8CL1sX13237 for <nanog@merit.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 23:01:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 23:01:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: "'nanog@merit.org'" <nanog@merit.org> Subject: Re: 60 Hudson Evacuation ? In-Reply-To: <D5F0BE7E951B7645A01B9305761709DD941577@yyzxch07.gt.ca> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109122259300.3376-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se> Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu Precedence: bulk Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu X-Loop: nanog