Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard
I suppose this would be an incredibly tacky time to say I told you so? Sean.
I suppose this would be an incredibly tacky time to say I told you so? Sean.
That depends. I expected you to say "I told you so", and if you want to call that "Paul expected Sean to be incredibly tacky" that's your business ;-). If any other NAP is running on one RS, then whoever is in charge of that NAP should be on Red Alert with people running up and down the halls, yelling for parts.
### On Fri, 24 May 1996 19:41:00 +0100, Sean Doran <smd@icp.net> wrote to ### nanog@Merit.Net, paul@vix.com concerning "Re: mae-west route servers are ### both down hard": SD> I suppose this would be an incredibly tacky time to say I told you so? s/tacky/misleading/g The RA services at MAE-West were never declared production because we did not have two operational RSes deployed there. The RSes at the other NAPs that have been declared for production were able to sustain a single-machine failure without loss of service. -- /*===================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@Merit.Net> ]======================+ | Systems Research Programmer, IE Group /| /|[~|)|~|~ N E T W O R K | | VOX: (313) 763-4907 FAX: (313) 747-3185 / |/ |[_|\| | Incorporated | +==[ Suite C2122, Bldg. 1 4251 Plymouth Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2785 ]==*/
participants (3)
-
Jake Khuon -
Paul A Vixie -
Sean Doran