AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19 is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet. Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere? -- Ben Buxton_____________________ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip Guy bb@zip.com.au /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Voice: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Dial-in: 9247-7288, 9247-9144 Fax: 92475276 v the best :)
Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere?
This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC. One of AT&T's NOCs may be reached at +1 (314) 519-5708. I found this surprising information using whois. randy
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 02:09:03AM +1000, BOFH wrote:
AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19 is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.
Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere?
On Sat, May 09, 1998 at 09:25:00AM -0700, Randy Bush replied, sarcastically:
This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC.
One of AT&T's NOCs may be reached at +1 (314) 519-5708. I found this surprising information using whois.
Now, see, Randy? There you go again. "noc@att.net ... Is _this_ the correct address". You _knew_ what he meant. Cheers, -- jr 'quit it, ok?' a -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby, Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592 Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC. <snip>
Give me a break. I think it's pretty obvious that he meant "is noc@att.net, an address I've already tried to email, the correct address to reach the ATT NOC?" Were you just venting, or did you seriously misunderstand that? Mike --------------- "BOFH" <bb@zip.com.au> wrote
AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19 is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.
Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere?
-- Ben Buxton_____________________ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip Guy bb@zip.com.au /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Voice: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Dial-in: 9247-7288, 9247-9144 Fax: 92475276 v the best :)
On Sun, 10 May 1998 michaels@sun.aracnet.com wrote:
"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few [snip] Give me a break. I think it's pretty obvious that he meant "is noc@att.net, an address I've already tried to email, the correct address to reach the ATT NOC?"
Were you just venting, or did you seriously misunderstand that?
Mike
Have you been reading this list for very long? If so, that must be a rhetorical question.
participants (5)
-
BOFH -
Jay R. Ashworth -
michaels＠sun.aracnet.com -
Randy Bush -
Scott Weeks