----- Original Message ----- From: "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve@skeeve.org> To: <apnic-talk@apnic.net>; <apnic-announce@lists.apnic.net> Cc: <apops@apops.net>; <sanog@sanog.org> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 5:08 PM Subject: RE: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8and122/7)
Just an opinion... But as someone who is currently experiencing the
using a /19 in 125/8 at present and have our customers suffering greatly, I think APNIC needs to do something better to be approaching the bogon
a little help ... ----- Forwarded by Joe Loiacono/CIV/CSC on 01/11/2006 10:51 AM ----- "Dong Yan" <dongyan @cnnic.cn> Sent by: apnic-talk-bounces 01/09/2006 10:17 PM To: <apnic-talk@apnic.net>, <apnic-announce@lists.apnic.net> cc: Chen Tao <chentao@cnnic.cn>, Xiangjian Li <lixiangjian@cnnic.cn> Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8and122/7) The same issue from China. One of our member got a block /17 from 125/8, this block caused many web-accessing problems, which annoyed our member very much. This time, when they came back for subsequent IPv4 application, they pointed out clearly they do not want to get any block in 125/8 or even newer /8. Any doable suggestion and action from APNIC and all members in AP region will be helpfull. Dong Yan CNNIC pain of list
managers and perhaps giving notice of 6 months or some such that these ranges will be used so the pain will be a lot less.
..Skeeve
-----Original Message----- From: apnic-talk-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:apnic-talk-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of John Tran Sent: Monday, 9 January 2006 3:15 PM To: apnic-announce@lists.apnic.net Cc: apops@apops.net; sanog@sanog.org Subject: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8 and122/7)
Dear colleagues
APNIC received IPv4 address blocks 121/8 and 122/7 from IANA in January 2006 and will be making allocations from these ranges in the near future.
This announcement is being made for the information of the Internet community so that network configurations such as routing filters may be updated as appropriate.
For more information on the resources administered by APNIC, see:
http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html
For information on the minimum allocation sizes within address ranges administered by APNIC, see:
http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html
Kind regards
Son
____________________________________________________________________ Resources Services Manager <Son@apnic.net> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre phone: +61 7 3858 3100 http://www.apnic.net fax: +61 7 3858 3199 Helpdesk phone: +61 7 3858 3188 email: helpdesk@apnic.net Please send Internet Resource Requests to <hostmaster@apnic.net> _____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Apnic-announce mailing list Apnic-announce@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
========================================================================
iBurst Wireless Broadband from $34.95/month www.platformnetworks.net Forward undetected SPAM to: spam@mailsecurity.net.au
========================================================================
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:50:52 EST, Joe Loiacono said:
a little help ... ... The same issue from China. One of our member got a block /17 from 125/8, this block caused
The only thing likely to help is a baseball bat (although a cricket bat will probably serve in a pinch, and you're from that part of the world). Seriously. We've been having this *SAME* problem since we started allocating from 68/8 or 69/8. If sites *still* haven't figured out yet how to get their bogon filters maintained, they need to have Team Cymru's address tattooed onto their skulls with a baseball bat.
On 1/11/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
from 68/8 or 69/8. If sites *still* haven't figured out yet how to get their bogon filters maintained, they need to have Team Cymru's address tattooed onto their skulls with a baseball bat.
It's that kind of hardcoding that got us here in the first place. ;) -Mike
--==_Exmh_1136999684_3854P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:50:52 EST, Joe Loiacono said:
a little help ... ... The same issue from China. One of our member got a block /17 from 125/8, this block caused
The only thing likely to help is a baseball bat (although a cricket bat will probably serve in a pinch, and you're from that part of the world).
Seriously. We've been having this *SAME* problem since we started allocating from 68/8 or 69/8. If sites *still* haven't figured out yet how to get their bogon filters maintained, they need to have Team Cymru's address tattooed onto their skulls with a baseball bat.
No, you are incorrect. Networks need to use authoritative sources for their information. Cymru is behind IANA, not in front. Cymru is a good resource, but I don't hear them calling themselves authoritative. I've never worked anywhere that I could blame a network problem on an RBL et. al. .edu may be different, but I doubt it. -M<
participants (4)
-
Joe Loiacono -
Martin Hannigan -
Mike Damm -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu