Re: Why Vadim likes statics
Bill, your "vision" about statics taking over made me laugh for quite a while. Nobody is about to replace dynamic routing with static. What Randy is talking about is a technique to avoid generation irrelevant rotuing updates. I.e. the rest of the network does not have to be informed that some of your interior LANs fell off, ok?
In the end, the Internet looks just like the telco mesh.
At least telephones work; and work reliably. Unlike Internet. And telephone network is orders of magnitude bigger than Internet; and went through numerous radical technology changes without losing integrity. Guess, telco engineers did something right. --vadim
ACtually, I like Eric's reply. Making pullup "distance" sensitive sounds like a big win. -- --bill
In message <199504242150.AA14892@zed.isi.edu>, bmanning@ISI.EDU writes:
ACtually, I like Eric's reply. Making pullup "distance" sensitive sounds like a big win.
-- --bill
I think combining AS path length and prefix length might be a good idea. Long prefixes and long AS paths better be very stable or they get held down (not held up, but down). The document and code that I half wrote a long time ago supported the notion of multiple sets of configured decay rate parameters though I didn't think of choosing parameter on this sort of basis. Thanks Eric for the comment. Curtis
participants (3)
-
bmanning@ISI.EDU
-
Curtis Villamizar
-
Vadim Antonov