Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo)
--- ge@linuxbox.org wrote: Well, perhaps you can share any information with us on a legitimate client you have? ---------------------------------- Now why do you have to go there? Just to fan the flames for fun and profit? :-( scott
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- ge@linuxbox.org wrote:
Well, perhaps you can share any information with us on a legitimate client you have? ----------------------------------
Now why do you have to go there? Just to fan the flames for fun and profit? :-(
I haven't seen any flames, I've seen them claim they cleaned up, instead of pointing out all their other bad clients, I am asking for a good one. Should be easy enough to manufacture. I am interesting in you take on this: I am starting to think of the horror of whoever gets assigned these IP addresses next trying to clean them all up so they are usable again. They are listed *everywhere* for a long time now. Gadi.
scott
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
--- ge@linuxbox.org wrote:
Well, perhaps you can share any information with us on a legitimate client you have? ----------------------------------
Now why do you have to go there? Just to fan the flames for fun and profit? :-(
scott
Scott, I am unsure how it is fun or profitable to ask this question which has been on everyones mind. I haven't personally seen anything worth noting that wasn't malicious from Intercage or Hostfresh. I can tell you the only thing that was even remotely legitimate from a report of all Hostfresh/Intercage traffic from my network was a couple porn sites. Everything else was malicious communication. I am sure if I looked into it more I could find some exploits related to the sites. Thanks, James
participants (3)
-
Gadi Evron -
James Pleger -
Scott Weeks