Subject: Re: Internet II is coming... Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 17:20:17 -0400 From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@biddeford.com>
On Wed, 9 Oct 1996 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Michael Dillon wrote:
My ISP has a 10Mbps fibre ATM circuit to BCNet in Vancouver that was installed in Aplril 1995. From there it connects to CA*Net which has a T3 into MCI Seattle as well as links to the East where more T3's head south to MCI. The T3's were T1's until Sept 1995 at which point there was a small improvement in speed at times.
So a 10Mbps fiber ATM circuit translates, after the cell tax and packet stredding, to 6Mbps on a real link. Is this not slow enough to be a bottleneck?
And, an OC-12c ATM circuit can provide nearly 540 Mbps of TCP data, after SONET, ATM, IP and TCP overheads. Perhaps, I missed your point... -tjs
On Mon, 14 Oct 1996 09:15:36 -0500 (CDT) Tim Salo wrote:
And, an OC-12c ATM circuit can provide nearly 540 Mbps of TCP data, after SONET, ATM, IP and TCP overheads.
Perhaps, I missed your point...
Explicit: 6meg is not very fast for an uplink speed for a whole ISP. Implicit: There seems to be a lot of: "It's ATM so it must be fast" going around. This conclusion does not follow. regards, fletcher
participants (2)
-
Fletcher E Kittredge
-
salo@msc.edu