sorry if someone thinks this is the wrong message for the group, but it does effect us all... we are seeing lots of routes coming in sho ip bgp sum BGP table version is 6699646, main routing table version 6699646 49793 network entries (94886/99644 paths) using 8897576 bytes of memory 11894 BGP path attribute entries using 1541824 bytes of memory but the routes seem to be coming from AS 7007... They are advertising many routes, even our own. Sorry, but email and phones to them isn't working. *> 156.5.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 167.32.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.56.218.0 137.39.167.29 0 701 701 701 3561 194 3909 1 1239 17 90 7007 ? *> 192.72.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.73.26.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.73.28.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.76.170.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? * 192.83.0.0 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 192.83.64.0 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? whois 156.5.0.0 Unilever (NET-UNILEVER2) Sprint International Christian
AS7007 has a 1 800 number 1 800 918-0524 I cant get an answer They started advertising more secific routes for our CIDR block at approx 7:45 PDT. They are connected to Sprintlink. Could someone pull the pug on these guys. Oh yes they also seem to be advertising a route for rs.internic.net so it took me a while to find them. John B. On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Christian Nielsen wrote:
sorry if someone thinks this is the wrong message for the group, but it does effect us all...
we are seeing lots of routes coming in
sho ip bgp sum BGP table version is 6699646, main routing table version 6699646 49793 network entries (94886/99644 paths) using 8897576 bytes of memory 11894 BGP path attribute entries using 1541824 bytes of memory
but the routes seem to be coming from AS 7007... They are advertising many routes, even our own. Sorry, but email and phones to them isn't working.
*> 156.5.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 167.32.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.56.218.0 137.39.167.29 0 701 701 701 3561 194 3909 1 1239 17 90 7007 ? *> 192.72.0.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.73.26.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.73.28.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 50 5650 3561 3561 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 192.76.170.0 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? * 192.83.0.0 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ? *> 137.39.167.29 50 701 701 701 1239 1790 7007 ? * 192.83.64.0 208.131.13.29 0 5650 6176 1239 1790 7007 ?
whois 156.5.0.0 Unilever (NET-UNILEVER2) Sprint International
Christian
I have now filterd all routes from 7007 ip as-path access-list 1 deny _7007$ This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and appology from 7007. There noc clams to be working on the problem. Not good enough. I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation. John Bradley AS6539 On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Christian Nielsen wrote:
sorry if someone thinks this is the wrong message for the group, but it does effect us all...
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, System Administrator wrote:
I have now filterd all routes from 7007
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _7007$
This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and appology from 7007.
There noc clams to be working on the problem. Not good enough.
I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation.
How about sending them a bill for all the time we've spent on fixing this problem? The fact that it may not have been intended is not relevant to whether they are liable for the damage they've caused. I can see a nice $2000 bill just from the time I and my employees have spent fixing the problem and notifying customers. Pete Kruckenberg pete@inquo.net
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, System Administrator wrote:
I have now filterd all routes from 7007
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _7007$
This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and appology from 7007.
There noc clams to be working on the problem. Not good enough.
I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation.
Unless Sprint (AS 1790) filters at the source (or simply shutdown the interface), we will remain in troubled waters. __ Pierre Thibaudeau | e-mail: <prt@Teleglobe.CA> TELEGLOBE CANADA | 1000, rue de La Gauchetiere ouest | Tel: +1-514-868-7257 Montreal, QC H3B 4X5 | Canada | fax: +1-514-868-8446
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Pierre Thibaudeau wrote: ==>On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, System Administrator wrote: ==> ==>> I have now filterd all routes from 7007 ==>> ==>> ip as-path access-list 1 deny _7007$ ==>> ==>> ==>> This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and ==>> appology from 7007. ==>> ==>> There noc clams to be working on the problem. ==>> Not good enough. ==>> ==>> I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation. ==> ==>Unless Sprint (AS 1790) filters at the source (or simply shutdown the ==>interface), we will remain in troubled waters. When I called mai.net, they mentioned that they had unplugged their mae-east connection as well as turned down their Sprint DS-3's until the source of the problem could be identified. /cah
Perhaps the more pertinent question is why AS7007's downstream provider didn't filter on AS7007's routes. -Steve --- Steve Corbato, Network Engineering Computing & Communications, University of Washington corbato@cac.washington.edu 206-685-6221 voice 206-685-4054 fax PGP key fingerprint = C7 75 FF BF 5A 4D 16 70 E6 49 22 63 C3 15 A2 AC On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, System Administrator wrote:
I have now filterd all routes from 7007
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _7007$
This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and appology from 7007.
There noc clams to be working on the problem. Not good enough.
I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation.
John Bradley AS6539
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Christian Nielsen wrote:
sorry if someone thinks this is the wrong message for the group, but it does effect us all...
This filter will remain in effect untill we get an explanation and appology from 7007.
There noc clams to be working on the problem. Not good enough.
Oh please get a clue. How is the fact that they where working on the problem "not good enough" ? What do you want them to do? Get out the beach chairs and wine and catch some rays?
I think that everyone shoud filter them untill we get an exexplanation.
I think everyone should engage brain before posting totally unhelp junk like the above. I'm sure that the offending ISP is very apologetic, but the atitude that you show is pretty unhelpful. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking. D O M I N O neil@DOMINO.ORG NetBSD/sparc - 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">Computer!</A>
participants (7)
-
Christian Nielsen -
Craig A. Huegen -
Neil J. McRae -
Pete Kruckenberg -
Pierre Thibaudeau -
root＠eagle.broadband.net -
Steve Corbato