Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks

I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous". http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanon... Also: http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html Andrew From: Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net> To: 'Marshall Eubanks' <tme@multicasttech.com>; 'North American Network Operators Group' <nanog@nanog.org> Cc: Sent: Saturday, 11 December 2010, 17:34:20 Subject: RE: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks I think the skill level of these guys is clearly evidenced by one of the members who forgot to remove the metadata from their most recent "press release". Stefan

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:59:07AM -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous".
http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanon...
Also:
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html
All we know with certainty is that there is *a* name in the metadata. Why would anyone conclude that it is definitely the name of the author? -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mikea@mikea.ath.cx Tired old sysadmin
participants (2)
-
andrew.wallace
-
mikea