Re: charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table
So I have a bunch of replies, some of which suggest targetting the ISPs directly (phone bank of educated volunteers), some of which wondered why ISPs would care since non-aggregation is seen as good business sense in some cases. A couple replies asked if they could operate the cameras; one myopic confused soul suggested *I* model instead of Vint. And then there were a couple replies that indicated that we are *already* running into problems with some combination of numbers of routes, numbers of paths and numbers of implementation bugs (leaks in one implementation, pointer woes in another). That last point is serious. I humbly suggest that it's time to spam all the end users the NLANR cache researchers can identify as porn browsers with a simple message: Hot sexy babes want YOU to choose a provider who's a good aggregator! [With a URL pointing to someone's CIDR page, with an obligatory link to t&a or c&a or or s&m or s&g or ipv6 or whatever perverted stuff people spend alot of time reading about. Indeed, maybe we can enlist Betty Bowers and the folks at http://www.landoverbaptist.org so that we cover all the bases]. Sean.
participants (1)
-
smd@clock.org