I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now). When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years? Somebody else is suggesting a Vyatta (Linux based) solution, which makes me a little nervous. Then again, Linux has improved dramatically from a security and stability P.O.V, so maybe it's worth a look if there's no hard drive involved. TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am =========================================================================
On 2/11/2010 10:53, James Smallacombe wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years?
Any 2800/3800 ISR (except the 2801) will handle this just fine with at least 512MB RAM if you want to stick with Cisco. You'll get more performance for the price out of Vyatta if that's more important. ~Seth
You can squeeze by with 512MB, but 1GB of ram would be better. A 7204VXR with 1GB of ram will work fine. You can also squeeze by with a 2951 ---- Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
-----Original Message----- From: James Smallacombe [mailto:up@3.am] Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:53 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Latest Cisco for small dual homed ASN
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years?
Somebody else is suggesting a Vyatta (Linux based) solution, which makes me a little nervous. Then again, Linux has improved dramatically from a security and stability P.O.V, so maybe it's worth a look if there's no hard drive involved.
TIA,
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am =========================================================================
On 2/11/2010 1:53 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years?
Somebody else is suggesting a Vyatta (Linux based) solution, which makes me a little nervous. Then again, Linux has improved dramatically from a security and stability P.O.V, so maybe it's worth a look if there's no hard drive involved.
I've been running vyatta, here, for a year now. Its running VPN's and its routing on a TimeWarner Fiber on a modest dual core supermicro server. Its never had to be restarted. Its only dropped its tunnel a few times, but a cronjob checks it and restarts if it goes away. Version : VC5.0.2 Copyright: 2006-2009 Vyatta, Inc. Built by : root@vyatta.com Built on : Fri Feb 27 03:18:16 UTC 2009 Build ID : 2009-02-26-2347-3bb1a83 Boot via : disk Uptime : 15:10:39 up 225 days, 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Cheers, Curtis
On 11/02/2010 18:53, James Smallacombe wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now). When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years?
There was a bit of info missing from the replies in this thread, so I shall inflict my thoughts onto you all. Sorry, but : On 11/02/2010 19:12, Matthew Huff wrote:
You can squeeze by with 512MB, but 1GB of ram would be better. A 7204VXR with 1GB of ram will work fine.
... though you would want an npe-g1 or npe-g2 to avoid frustration. On 11/02/2010 19:08, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Any 2800/3800 ISR (except the 2801) will handle this just fine
Any sort of attack traffic will hurt this family in a hosting environment in my experience. They are good (feature-rich) in the 'branch' environment though. We are also rolling out huge volumes of Juniper equipment, and medium to high end J-series equipment is likely to vastly exceed expectations without exceeding your budget. Andy -- // www.netsumo.com // Professional network engineering consultancy // // uk ddi: +44(0)20 7993 1702 // us ddi: (415) 520 3589 //
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:53 PM, James Smallacombe <up@3.am> wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than adequate. With routing tables growing the way they are, what's a good Cisco based solution on the lower end of the price spectrum that should handle this fine for a few years?
I use 2811s in a couple of similar configurations. One of them currently uses about 400M of the 768M ram with 4 BGP feeds and "soft-reconfiguration inbound." Another with just one BGP feed and soft-reconfiguration takes about 300M. Needs a minute or so to recover from one of the BGP links dropping but otherwise it keeps up with my light-weight traffic just fine. In both cases the packets are cpu-switched and normal CPU load (when a link isn't collapsing or returning) is under 10%. -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
participants (6)
-
Andy Davidson -
Curtis Maurand -
James Smallacombe -
Matthew Huff -
Seth Mattinen -
William Herrin