Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:49, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote: > Without the generous support of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 this dumbass > lowlife IP address space thief would be largely if not entirely toast. > So what are they waiting for? Why don't their turf this jackass? Are > they waiting for an engraved invitation or what? > > As I always ask, retorically, in cases like this: Where are the grownups? --- ops.lists@gmail.com wrote: From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> "we are not the internet police" right? ( ----------------------------- So your answer is to let them hijack whatever/whenever they want? scott
Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people don't realize you're being sarcastic. On 27/06/18, 6:53 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Scott Weeks" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote: On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:49, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote: > Without the generous support of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 this dumbass > lowlife IP address space thief would be largely if not entirely toast. > So what are they waiting for? Why don't their turf this jackass? Are > they waiting for an engraved invitation or what? > > As I always ask, retorically, in cases like this: Where are the grownups? --- ops.lists@gmail.com wrote: From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> "we are not the internet police" right? ( ----------------------------- So your answer is to let them hijack whatever/whenever they want? scott
On 27/Jun/18 04:18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people don't realize you're being sarcastic.
Text-based messaging is terribly reliable at helping miss the point... It's a good things our kids of today call each other on the phone to avoid that :-)... Mark.
I ain't friday, but: There is no RFC for the Sarcastica font yet? PS: Our little adventure in BGP who-done-it (a few weeks back) burned about 25-30h man hours estimated. Should have been sub 5 hours if 1 guy would have cooperated instead of ignoring the issue. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 06/27/18 03:25, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 27/Jun/18 04:18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people don't realize you're being sarcastic. Text-based messaging is terribly reliable at helping miss the point...
It's a good things our kids of today call each other on the phone to avoid that :-)...
Mark.
Why would we need an RFC for Comic Sans? -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:50 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 I ain't friday, but: There is no RFC for the Sarcastica font yet? PS: Our little adventure in BGP who-done-it (a few weeks back) burned about 25-30h man hours estimated. Should have been sub 5 hours if 1 guy would have cooperated instead of ignoring the issue. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 06/27/18 03:25, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 27/Jun/18 04:18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people don't realize you're being sarcastic. Text-based messaging is terribly reliable at helping miss the point...
It's a good things our kids of today call each other on the phone to avoid that :-)...
Mark.
My VT52 does not do fonts ... --- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Hamel Sent: Wednesday, 27 June, 2018 14:54 To: ahebert@pubnix.net; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3
Why would we need an RFC for Comic Sans?
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:50 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3
I ain't friday, but: There is no RFC for the Sarcastica font yet?
PS: Our little adventure in BGP who-done-it (a few weeks back) burned about 25-30h man hours estimated. Should have been sub 5 hours if 1 guy would have cooperated instead of ignoring the issue.
----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 06/27/18 03:25, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 27/Jun/18 04:18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people
Text-based messaging is terribly reliable at helping miss the
don't realize you're being sarcastic. point...
It's a good things our kids of today call each other on the phone
to
avoid that :-)...
Mark.
participants (6)
-
Alain Hebert -
Keith Medcalf -
Mark Tinka -
Ryan Hamel -
Scott Weeks -
Suresh Ramasubramanian