Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for: [may '96 figures] Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 127 Class B - 10150 Class C - 764202 Percentage Allocated (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 100.00% Class B - 61.95% Class C - 36.44% No, back to your regularly scheduled programming. :-) - paul At 10:47 PM 6/4/96 -0400, Mark Kosters wrote:
Would anyone have a pointer for recent v4 address allocation statistics? I'm aware of the Frank's [solensky@ftp.com] presentation material which he talked about in Los Angeles, but I was looking for something a bit more recent, and perhaps HTML'ized. Raw figures welcome.
The the most recent raw-data report that Frank has based his work on is available at: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations
They are generated on a monthly basis and filenames are in the form: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations.YYMmm
Regards, Mark
--
Mark Kosters markk@internic.net +1 703 742 4795 Principal Investigator InterNIC Registration Services PGP Key fingerprint = 1A 2A 92 F8 8E D3 47 F9 15 65 80 87 68 13 F6 48
Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
[may '96 figures]
Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 127
128 <-- :)
Class B - 10150 Class C - 764202
Percentage Allocated (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 100.00% Class B - 61.95% Class C - 36.44%
No, back to your regularly scheduled programming. :-)
- paul
At 10:47 PM 6/4/96 -0400, Mark Kosters wrote:
Would anyone have a pointer for recent v4 address allocation statistics? I'm aware of the Frank's [solensky@ftp.com] presentation material which he talked about in Los Angeles, but I was looking for something a bit more recent, and perhaps HTML'ized. Raw figures welcome.
The the most recent raw-data report that Frank has based his work on is available at: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations
They are generated on a monthly basis and filenames are in the form: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations.YYMmm
Regards, Mark
--
Mark Kosters markk@internic.net +1 703 742 4795 Principal Investigator InterNIC Registration Services PGP Key fingerprint = 1A 2A 92 F8 8E D3 47 F9 15 65 80 87 68 13 F6 48
-- --bill
Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
[may '96 figures]
Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 127
128 <-- :)
Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx Class A (0-127) Bit pattern 10xxxxxx Class B (128-191) Bit pattern 110xxxxx Class C (192-223) Bit pattern 1110xxxx Class D (224-239) I give up. Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the old style class B range? Ehud
Class B - 10150 Class C - 764202
Percentage Allocated (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 100.00% Class B - 61.95% Class C - 36.44%
No, back to your regularly scheduled programming. :-)
- paul
At 10:47 PM 6/4/96 -0400, Mark Kosters wrote:
Would anyone have a pointer for recent v4 address allocation statistics? I'm aware of the Frank's [solensky@ftp.com] presentation material which he talked about in Los Angeles, but I was looking for something a bit more recent, and perhaps HTML'ized. Raw figures welcome.
The the most recent raw-data report that Frank has based his work on is available at: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations
They are generated on a monthly basis and filenames are in the form: ftp://rs.internic.net/netinfo/ip_network_allocations.YYMmm
Regards, Mark
--
Mark Kosters markk@internic.net +1 703 742 4795 Principal Investigator InterNIC Registration Services PGP Key fingerprint = 1A 2A 92 F8 8E D3 47 F9 15 65 80 87 68 13 F6 48
-- --bill
Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
[may '96 figures]
Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 127
128 <-- :)
Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx Class A (0-127) Bit pattern 10xxxxxx Class B (128-191) Bit pattern 110xxxxx Class C (192-223) Bit pattern 1110xxxx Class D (224-239)
I give up. Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the old style class B range?
Class B - 10150 Class C - 764202
You did not go wrong, look at the way Paul did the distribution. For that matter, look at you supplied bit patterns. 0 to 127 is how many? 128!! :) (side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127) (any takers? :) -- --bill
You did not go wrong...
D'oh. Time to have another Sammy.
(side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
Politically easy, legacy-kernel-wise nigh impossible :) That code is _designed_ to waste net 0. E (sammy := Samuel Adams Lager)
participants (3)
-
bmanning＠isi.edu -
Ehud Gavron -
Paul Ferguson