Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for: [may '96 figures] Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 127 Class B - 10150 Class C - 764202 Percentage Allocated (Allocated and Assigned Combined) Class A - 100.00% Class B - 61.95% Class C - 36.44% No, back to your regularly scheduled programming. :-) - paul At 10:47 PM 6/4/96 -0400, Mark Kosters wrote:
Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx Class A (0-127) Bit pattern 10xxxxxx Class B (128-191) Bit pattern 110xxxxx Class C (192-223) Bit pattern 1110xxxx Class D (224-239) I give up. Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the old style class B range? Ehud
-- --bill
You did not go wrong...
D'oh. Time to have another Sammy.
(side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
Politically easy, legacy-kernel-wise nigh impossible :) That code is _designed_ to waste net 0. E (sammy := Samuel Adams Lager)
participants (3)
-
bmanning＠isi.edu -
Ehud Gavron -
Paul Ferguson