I was looking through a modified copy of smurf.c I had (it listened on a port and when an incoming connection was detected, it asked for a host and then smurfed it--or so the documentation says, I just wanted to see how the port listening was achieved) and just wanted to check how many of the broadcasts in the default bcastaddr[] still were smurfable, and noted that the *very first one* was. How would I go about finding out the administrative contact for a network given its broadcast address? Specifically I'm looking for 165.154.1.255, but there are probably some others as well... root@narnia:~# ping -c2 165.154.1.255 PING 165.154.1.255 (165.154.1.255): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 165.154.1.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=287.2 ms 64 bytes from 165.154.1.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=309.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=338.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=358.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=388.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=399.1 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=418.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.57: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=439.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=449.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=459.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=219.8 ms --- 165.154.1.255 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, +10 duplicates, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 219.8/378.0/468.9 ms root@narnia:~# (what the heck is that 127.0.0.2 doing in there...?) -- Daniel Reed <n@narnia.n.ml.org> (3CE060DD) System administrator of narnia.n.ml.org (narnia.mhv.net [199.0.0.118]) What does not destroy me, makes me strong. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
seems to be hookup.net.. bow[bow]$ host -l hookup.net | grep "165.154.1." auth1.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.17 smtp1.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.13 smtp1.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.15 ns1.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.1 mail1.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.5 ns2.hookup.net has address 165.154.105.2 loki.tor.hookup.net has address 165.154.1.21 noc.tor.hookup.net has address 165.154.1.1 vertex.tor.hookup.net has address 165.154.1.7 --- bow[bow]$ whois 165.154.1.1 HookUp Communications (NOC9-HST) Hostname: NOC.TOR.HOOKUP.NET Address: 165.154.1.1 System: ? running ? Coordinator: Hookup Communications Registry (HCR2-ORG) registry@HOOKUP.NET 905-847-8000 Fax- 905-847-8420 Domain Server Record last updated on 24-Mar-97. Database last updated on 3-Feb-98 04:10:40 EDT. The InterNIC Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet Information (Networks, ASN's, Domains, and POC's). Please use the whois server at nic.ddn.mil for MILNET Information. ---- -bow
I was looking through a modified copy of smurf.c I had (it listened on a port and when an incoming connection was detected, it asked for a host and then smurfed it--or so the documentation says, I just wanted to see how the port listening was achieved) and just wanted to check how many of the broadcasts in the default bcastaddr[] still were smurfable, and noted that the *very first one* was. How would I go about finding out the administrative contact for a network given its broadcast address? Specifically I'm looking for 165.154.1.255, but there are probably some others as well...
root@narnia:~# ping -c2 165.154.1.255 PING 165.154.1.255 (165.154.1.255): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 165.154.1.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=287.2 ms 64 bytes from 165.154.1.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=309.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=338.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=358.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=388.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=399.1 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=418.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.57: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=439.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=449.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=459.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=219.8 ms
--- 165.154.1.255 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, +10 duplicates, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 219.8/378.0/468.9 ms root@narnia:~#
(what the heck is that 127.0.0.2 doing in there...?)
-- Daniel Reed <n@narnia.n.ml.org> (3CE060DD) System administrator of narnia.n.ml.org (narnia.mhv.net [199.0.0.118]) What does not destroy me, makes me strong. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Daniel, Try mskucher@hookup.net HookUp Communications 165.154.0.0/16 do you think this will help? tatsuya ----------------------------------------------------------- いつもお世話になっております かわさき@ giganetです。 かわさき = = = = = = 電話 03-3239-0607 fax 03-3239-2609 business network telecom http://www.giganet.net On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Daniel Reed wrote:
I was looking through a modified copy of smurf.c I had (it listened on a port and when an incoming connection was detected, it asked for a host and then smurfed it--or so the documentation says, I just wanted to see how the port listening was achieved) and just wanted to check how many of the broadcasts in the default bcastaddr[] still were smurfable, and noted that the *very first one* was. How would I go about finding out the administrative contact for a network given its broadcast address? Specifically I'm looking for 165.154.1.255, but there are probably some others as well...
root@narnia:~# ping -c2 165.154.1.255 PING 165.154.1.255 (165.154.1.255): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 165.154.1.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=287.2 ms 64 bytes from 165.154.1.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=309.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=338.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=358.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=388.9 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=399.1 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=418.8 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.57: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=439.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=449.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.1.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=459.0 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=219.8 ms
--- 165.154.1.255 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, +10 duplicates, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 219.8/378.0/468.9 ms root@narnia:~#
(what the heck is that 127.0.0.2 doing in there...?)
-- Daniel Reed <n@narnia.n.ml.org> (3CE060DD) System administrator of narnia.n.ml.org (narnia.mhv.net [199.0.0.118]) What does not destroy me, makes me strong. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 12:01:49PM +0900, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
Daniel,
Try mskucher@hookup.net
HookUp Communications 165.154.0.0/16
do you think this will help?
Daniel, $ whois 167.154.0.0 1075 North Service Road West, Suite 207 Oakville, Ontario L6M 2G2 Canada Netname: HOOKUP-NET-4 Netnumber: 165.154.0.0 Murray Kucher (mskucher@hookup.net, still listed as hookup's contact in various databases) has long left HookUp; I don't believe his @hookup.net address works anymore. To confuse matters further, NetCom Canada has some odd ownership of HookUp, whom I believe declared bankruptcy. Last I heard, NetCom only acquired HookUp's customer base. I mention this in the event that you are unable to find anyone at HookUp -- try a contact from www.netcom.ca instead. noc@hookup.net may forward somewhere useful. Hope this helps, -Chris Chris Portman ================================================= chris@unix.org Senior Systems Operations and Security iSTAR Internet Inc. (613) 788-7767 Ottawa, ON, CA
Try mskucher@hookup.net
HookUp Communications 165.154.0.0/16
do you think this will help?
Hookup went bankrupt several months ago. Much of it went to Netcom Canada, and some of the franchise pieces went to a company called Interhop. Murray is definately not there anymore. 165.154/16 is routed via UUNET Canada, to Interhop. RADB claims it to Interhop via MCI. Clearly INTERNIC records have not been updated by the new owners. Hookup had a number of CIDR blocks and several AS numbers if I remember correctly. Eric Carroll eric.carroll@acm.org Tekton Internet Associates
I was looking through a modified copy of smurf.c I had (it listened on a port and when an incoming connection was detected, it asked for a host and then smurfed it--or so the documentation says, I just wanted to see how the port listening was achieved) and just wanted to check how many of the broadcasts in the default bcastaddr[] still were smurfable, and noted that the *very first one* was. How would I go about finding out the administrative contact for a network given its broadcast address? Specifically I'm looking for 165.154.1.255, but there are probably some others as well...
This is an easy one... [root@evillive][10:14am][/root] #whois 165.154.0.0 [rs.internic.net] HookUp Communications (NET-HOOKUP-NET-4) 1075 North Service Road West, Suite 207 Oakville, Ontario L6M 2G2 Canada Netname: HOOKUP-NET-4 Netnumber: 165.154.0.0 Coordinator: Hookup Communications Registry (HCR2-ORG) registry@HOOKUP.NET 905-847-8000 Fax- 905-847-8420 Domain System inverse mapping provided by: NS1.HOOKUP.NET 165.154.105.1 NS2.HOOKUP.NET 165.154.105.2 Record last updated on 03-Sep-97. Database last updated on 4-Feb-98 04:14:08 EDT.
root@narnia:~# ping -c2 165.154.1.255 PING 165.154.1.255 (165.154.1.255): 56 data bytes -- Daniel Reed <n@narnia.n.ml.org> (3CE060DD) System administrator of narnia.n.ml.org (narnia.mhv.net [199.0.0.118]) What does not destroy me, makes me strong. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
participants (6)
-
bow＠bow.net -
chris＠unix.org -
Daniel Reed -
Eric M. Carroll -
Joe Shaw -
Tatsuya Kawasaki