Re: packet loss out of Texas on Cogent and GlobalCrossing
Good point, I can't seem to reproduce with the looking glass interfaces out there. They either don't use enough packets in sequence or don't through the problem hops. On this path: Send ICMP echos to 24.227.216.194, timeout is 2 seconds, maximum hops are 32,1 0ms 1ms 0ms 74.201.153.2212 143ms 10ms 0ms 216.52.95.893 1ms 1ms 1ms 77.67.70.974 1ms 1ms 1ms 213.200.66.2105 3ms 1ms 2ms 66.198.111.976 19ms 7ms 7ms 216.6.87.97 7ms 7ms 7ms 216.6.87.28 6ms 7ms 7ms 66.198.154.149 6ms 7ms 6ms 107.14.19.13210 107ms 108ms 113ms 66.109.10.1111 118ms 144ms 120ms 107.14.17.13912 119ms 120ms 120ms 72.179.205.5913 115ms 115ms 114ms 24.73.240.19514 115ms 115ms 115ms 24.73.240.252 I re-tested and using 100 msg counts, I get 3-6% packet loss on anything after 10. On hops 1-10, I'm all clean. That 66.109.10.11 address is inside TimeWarner/RR so I'll keep trying to contact them. On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com> wrote:
Have you check the relevant looking glass sites?
http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass http://www.globalcrossing.com/network/network_looking_glass.aspx
We are connected to both providers, so everything is looking clean for us.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222
-----Original Message----- From: Charles Gagnon [mailto:charlesg@unixrealm.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:11 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: packet loss out of Texas on Cogent and GlobalCrossing
I need the Nanog intellect,
We are seeing packet loss in certain scenarios only on traffic to and from Austin, TX. The local provider is Time Warner and they are not having (obvious) problems. We ran tests from NY and NJ over Internap and AboveNet connections.We only see problems when the traffic goes over gblx or cogent. Has anyone heard of problem with these carriers out of Texas? -- Charles Gagnon charlesg at unixrealm.com
-- Charles Gagnon charlesg at unixrealm.com
I take multiple services from Global Crossing in San Jose and have had reports of packet loss from Cogent users in Chicago and London (and been able to reproduce). In all cases it appears to be after wherever Cogents' "mci01" location is. 10.|-- te0-3-0-3.mpd21.mci01.atl 0.0% 100 205.7 205.2 204.5 207.7 0.7 11.|-- te0-5-0-4.mpd21.ord01.atl 7.0% 100 238.4 235.6 230.4 239.1 2.0 12.|-- te0-0-0-5.ccr21.bos01.atl 4.0% 100 315.1 315.0 314.6 316.7 0.3 13.|-- te0-0-0-2.mpd21.lon13.atl 10.0% 100 323.7 323.7 321.6 325.7 0.7 14.|-- te2-1.ccr01.lon01.atlas.c 6.0% 100 324.6 332.8 314.9 523.0 38.5 15.|-- te1-2.mpd01.lon01.atlas.c 9.0% 100 326.3 339.3 324.9 506.0 39.5 10.|-- te0-4-0-3.mpd21.mci01.atl 0.0% 100 206.1 208.9 204.6 225.8 5.3 11.|-- te0-4-0-3.mpd21.ord01.atl 3.0% 100 239.2 237.0 228.7 239.5 1.9 12.|-- te0-0-0-1.ccr21.ord03.atl 4.0% 100 239.1 237.4 228.3 240.9 2.0 13.|-- te2-1.mpd02.ord03.atlas.c 4.0% 100 228.0 235.2 227.0 350.2 23.9 McDonald On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Charles Gagnon <charlesg@unixrealm.com>wrote:
Good point, I can't seem to reproduce with the looking glass interfaces out there. They either don't use enough packets in sequence or don't through the problem hops. On this path:
Send ICMP echos to 24.227.216.194, timeout is 2 seconds, maximum hops are 32,1 0ms 1ms 0ms 74.201.153.2212 143ms 10ms 0ms 216.52.95.893 1ms 1ms 1ms 77.67.70.974 1ms 1ms 1ms 213.200.66.2105 3ms 1ms 2ms 66.198.111.976 19ms 7ms 7ms 216.6.87.97 7ms 7ms 7ms 216.6.87.28 6ms 7ms 7ms 66.198.154.149 6ms 7ms 6ms 107.14.19.13210 107ms 108ms 113ms 66.109.10.1111 118ms 144ms 120ms 107.14.17.13912 119ms 120ms 120ms 72.179.205.5913 115ms 115ms 114ms 24.73.240.19514 115ms 115ms 115ms 24.73.240.252 I re-tested and using 100 msg counts, I get 3-6% packet loss on anything after 10. On hops 1-10, I'm all clean. That 66.109.10.11 address is inside TimeWarner/RR so I'll keep trying to contact them.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com> wrote:
Have you check the relevant looking glass sites?
http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass http://www.globalcrossing.com/network/network_looking_glass.aspx
We are connected to both providers, so everything is looking clean for us.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222
-----Original Message----- From: Charles Gagnon [mailto:charlesg@unixrealm.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:11 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: packet loss out of Texas on Cogent and GlobalCrossing
I need the Nanog intellect,
We are seeing packet loss in certain scenarios only on traffic to and from Austin, TX. The local provider is Time Warner and they are not having (obvious) problems. We ran tests from NY and NJ over Internap and AboveNet connections.We only see problems when the traffic goes over gblx or cogent. Has anyone heard of problem with these carriers out of Texas? -- Charles Gagnon charlesg at unixrealm.com
-- Charles Gagnon charlesg at unixrealm.com
participants (2)
-
Charles Gagnon -
McDonald Richards