bits/hz/second: we're barely more efficient than the telegraph (Re: TransAtlantic 40 Gig Waves
I'll comment on both: On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Rod Beck<Rod.Beck@hiberniaatlantic.com> wrote:
Rod, do you know if the 40G waves increased the spectrum efficiency of your fiber? On land systems they pretty much break even, i.e. you can
[rod beck replies]
The enabling technology is based on advanced encoding techniques allowing a greater rate of symbol transfer."
Looking back in Google and other IEEE papers, the previous 20 years of interfacing our abstract "bits" to the real world via photons hasn't been met with terribly high efficiencies, though we certainly have seen both great progress in the transmitter (who could have imagined a VCSEL in 1985?) and receiver technology, and of course a significant improvement in usable bits/sec. I can only wonder what the curve of optical spectral efficiency we achieve over the next decades will resemble. Perhaps we'll have to wait for a "Shannon of Optics" to stand up (or quit their day job at whatever modern-day version of $bell_labs they're stuck working for) and point out something obvious we're missing. A bit of sobering reality I often consider is we waited roughly a century to progress from where Marconi began to the present day, where we have cheap radios doing 12 bits/hz/sec costing about $20k (a pair). Clearly a key difference is that people are paying (allot, propotionately) to communicate $stuff and folks value networks more than they did previously - so we're not in the same position folks were pre-1900's, struggling to find a market for their crazy wires across the sea. For the experts out there: how long are we going to wait for something more efficient than morse code over twisted pairs? -Tk
Anton Kapela wrote:
For the experts out there: how long are we going to wait for something more efficient than morse code over twisted pairs?
For text messages, Morse code can be more efficient than modern encoding techniques. Morse is a variable-length code weighted to favor the more common symbols in plain text messages. The letter "e" is a single bit. In terms of message throughput/hz/second/, Morse is actually pretty decent. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
participants (2)
-
Anton Kapela
-
Jay Hennigan