Of course, sftp and other ssh-based protocols are *still* hamstrung to a maximum of 32k data outstanding due to hardcoded SSH channel window sizes by default for most people, unless you're patching up both your clients and servers. Sadly, this blows ssh out of the water for anything with even modest high-bitrate requirements over moderate-BDP links. - S -----Original Message----- From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 23:27 To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com>; nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
While HTTP remains popular as a way to interact with humans, especially if you want to try to do redirects, acknowledge license agreements, etc., FTP is the file transfer protocol of choice for basic file transfer
Speak for yourself. I haven't used FTP to transfer files in 10 years now. About 7 years ago I turned off FTP support for all of our webhosting clients, and forced them to use SFTP. 3 left, for a net loss of $45/month. And we stopped having to deal with the massive undertaking that supporting FTP properly chrooted and capable of dealing with all parts of the multi-mount web platform required. We've never looked back. Ever once in a while I find someone who's offering a file I want only via FTP, and I chide them and they fix it ;-) -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
From: Skywing <Skywing@valhallalegends.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:55:07 -0500
Of course, sftp and other ssh-based protocols are *still* hamstrung to a maximum of 32k data outstanding due to hardcoded SSH channel window sizes by default for most people, unless you're patching up both your clients and servers.
Sadly, this blows ssh out of the water for anything with even modest high-bitrate requirements over moderate-BDP links.
The HPN patches for OpenSSH are readily available and, at least on FreeBSD, including them is just a single checkbox when you install. That said, I have been told that there is a corner case where a transfer using the HPN patches will lock up. I have never seen it, but that is purported to be the reason that OpenBSD has not accepted the patches for the base OpenSSH software. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
participants (2)
-
Kevin Oberman
-
Skywing