[IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions
Hi all, We're trying to monitor our BGP IPv6 sessions on our 6500. * It's look like Cisco MIB's doesn't support it: o http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipv6/configuration/12-2sx/ip6-mn... * Searching on Nagios' plugins, I don't see how (I suppose it's by the reason above): o http://exchange.nagios.org/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=search&Itemid=74&searchword=bgp Anyone can help us on that matter? Thanks in advance, Carlos.
Hi Nick, Taking your comment into consideration, while we don't have the support for IPv6 on the BGP MIB, I'm afraid we'll have to monitor it "by hand". Best regards, Carlos. -----Mensaje original----- De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org] Enviado el: jueves, 19 de abril de 2012 10:24 Para: Carlos Asensio CC: nanog@nanog.org Asunto: Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
Anyone can help us on that matter?
We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years. I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6 sessions are down or broken. Nick
There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs... --chip On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Carlos Asensio <CAsensio@nexica.com> wrote:
Hi Nick,
Taking your comment into consideration, while we don't have the support for IPv6 on the BGP MIB, I'm afraid we'll have to monitor it "by hand".
Best regards, Carlos.
-----Mensaje original----- De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org] Enviado el: jueves, 19 de abril de 2012 10:24 Para: Carlos Asensio CC: nanog@nanog.org Asunto: Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions
On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
Anyone can help us on that matter?
We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6 sessions are down or broken.
Nick
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs...
<shudder> All I've seen of Netconf so far indicates that it noticeably more heavyweight than SNMP. But I could be wrong... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
participants (5)
-
Carlos Asensio -
chip -
Nick Hilliard -
Sander Steffann -
sthaug＠nethelp.no