Folks, I'm wondering about the following two aspects of different DHCPv6 implementations out there: 1) What's the pattern with which addresses are generated/assigned? Are they sequential (fc00::1, fc00::2, etc.)? Random? Something else? 2) What about their stability? Is there any intent/mechanism for them to be as "stable" as possible? Or is it usual for hosts to get a new address for each lease? P.S.: I understand this is likely to vary from one implementation to another... so please describe which implementation/version you're referring to. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:
Folks,
I'm wondering about the following two aspects of different DHCPv6 implementations out there:
1) What's the pattern with which addresses are generated/assigned? Are they sequential (fc00::1, fc00::2, etc.)? Random? Something else?
Depends on your DHCPv6 server implementation. I believe ISC defaults to random. I’m not sure if that’s configurable or not.
2) What about their stability? Is there any intent/mechanism for them to be as "stable" as possible? Or is it usual for hosts to get a new address for each lease?
I believe they are generally stable in that once a DUID is associated with an address, that association is persistent, but that may also be implementation dependent.
P.S.: I understand this is likely to vary from one implementation to another... so please describe which implementation/version you're referring to.
I have limited experience with the ISC DHCPv6 server. Mostly I just use SLAAC. Owen
participants (2)
-
Fernando Gont
-
Owen DeLong