Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to be a great idea... 8 48port blades.. pose a challenge.. or a
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote: problem..
Pictures are welcomed... off-list contact would be great.
Thanks
If you can choose your rack equipment, you should look at Ortronics Might Mo 10. It is very stable and has plenty of cable management options. They are kind of a cross between a two post and a cabinet. Basicaly the side cannel is 16.25 inces deep. Unfortunatly, the 6500 has slot spacing that doesn't line up with rack U's so most cable management will not work perfectly. The Might Mo can handle the density but make sure you use the largest vertical channels you have room for. You probably are not interested in doors but in locations where this is desired, the doors over the vertical channels hinge both wasy and remove easier than anything I've seen. You probably want to look at the air baffles since the 6509/6513 have right to left airflow rather than front to back. One fo the features in the Mighty Mo 10 is the ventilated side channels and available baffles. The airflow can actualy be one of your biggest challenges if you have 6509/6513's in adjacent cabinets. The warm air from one can blow into the input of the switch to the left. You could also look at using the WS-C6509-V-E chassis with front to back airflow and built in cable management. From: Brian Dantzig Senior Network Engineer Medline Industries, Inc. bdantzig@medline.com
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Dantzig, Brian wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to be a great idea... 8 48port blades.. pose a challenge.. or a problem..
Pictures are welcomed... off-list contact would be great.
Thanks
If you can choose your rack equipment, you should look at Ortronics Might Mo 10. It is very stable and has plenty of cable management
Let me 2nd the mighty mo! We went with them, and had our cabling contractor pre-wire the switch faces to patch panels. They're really nice--probably the nicest rack system I've worked with. In the photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/jwasilko/3213527881/in/set-72157612760455411/ the first 2 racks with black patches are for patching switch ports to racks. The Ciscos are in the 3rd and 4th racks. One of the things we did that worked out very nice was on the switch/rack patch panel, we interspersed switch ports and rack ports every 2U. This means that we can often patch servers to switch ports with a 2 or 3' cable, which really minimizes the amount of extra cable running up and down patch panels. I've got a bunch of other photos at: http://www.smoe.org/jeffw/gallery-new/e_dc_build_2008-10-06 http://www.smoe.org/jeffw/gallery-new/e_dc_build_2008-07-15
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:16, Jeff Wasilko <jeffw@smoe.org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Dantzig, Brian wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Let me 2nd the mighty mo! We went with them, and had our cabling contractor pre-wire the switch faces to patch panels. They're really nice--probably the nicest rack system I've worked with.
I'll give a hearty second to prewired patch panels. Even with the best cable management systems, patching directly into the switch is likely to eventually get messy. At least with the patch panels, even if cabling there gets messy for any reason, the front of the switches stay nice and clean, which makes a huge difference if you ever have a line card swap.
participants (3)
-
Dantzig, Brian
-
Jeff Wasilko
-
Matthew Schlegel