On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:48:33 -0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com said:

true enough. i guess this means that we get IPv6 "as is, where is" and there will be limited new development of same.

I can't conceive of any possible solution to IPv6 mobility, multihoming, routing, <insert deficiency here> which would find the mere fact that the WG is closed a problem, given that a decade of the WG being *open* didn't produce deployable results.