Make Money Fast (Internet II )
I work 80 hours a week not only because I'm an IP engineer*, but also because I'm a consultant and a business owner of an ISP. If there will be an Internet II, I see LOTS AND LOTS of opportunities for any person with a brain, and even some CNEs. For an Internet II to be designed, implemented, maintained, connected to R&E sites all over the country, and successfully, LOTS of consulting dollars are going to be spent. As someone who actually understands packets, headers, routing, etc. I suspect I'll be quite busy. This is good. For an Internet II to be successful, it will HAVE to be interconnected to The Internet. (That's "Internet I" in "Internet II"-Speak). These interconnects will include cool things like "settlements" and other phone-speak some of us have been fighting since 1985, or they will provide lots of unrestricted fed-funds to commercial ISPs. (can you guess which one I think's going to happen.) THIS TOO is a golden business opportunity. In short, who cares whether academia dreamed this up or not. Who cares if it will work tomorrow with 8ms coast-to-coast (Thanks, Vadim, for bringing physics into it ;) or whether or not it will be instantly perfect like the Internet is ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ the first time at sex ^H^H^H^H^H^H like Star Trek I ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H well, like something that's instantly perfect the first time, even though I can't come up with any examples. No, this is not a feel-good note. This is just my way of saying "It's been rather quiet on NANOG, and Internet II's only connection to NANOG is how we work with/interconnect/plan such a network. Not whether academicians ought to shave and get real jobs." Ehud * Ob rant: I'm tired of guys who've ``practiced'' cisco ``scripts'' and call themselves IP engineers. They ``know'' something because they've seen it before -- not because they understand it, could engineer it differently, or could do the underlying concepts under a different paradigm. I realize we can't all know everything, but I'm really tired of those who know nothing and have humongous egos.
On Wed, 9 Oct 1996, Ehud Gavron wrote:
I work 80 hours a week not only because I'm an IP engineer*, but also because I'm a consultant and a business owner of an ISP.
Boy, you are lucky. Only 80 hr a week? What's your secret?
If there will be an Internet II, I see LOTS AND LOTS of opportunities for any person with a brain, and even some CNEs.
For an Internet II to be designed, implemented, maintained, connected to R&E sites all over the country, and successfully, LOTS of consulting dollars are going to be spent. As someone who actually understands packets, headers, routing, etc. I suspect I'll be quite busy. This is good.
Heh, I guess you aren't that familiar with how large R&E universities work. Most of them already have a fairly good/outstanding group of net engineering folks who like slaving away 100+ hrs/week for very substandard wage for the sake of the lovely "academic" environment. (don't ask me why) And if that's not enough, they have herds of clueless but moderately intelligent and very willing CE/CS grad students/undergrad they would happily throw into the fire to see if they have asbestos skin. What, you think NSFNET I/ARPAnet was built with expensive consulting dollars or something? -dorian
participants (2)
-
Dorian R. Kim
-
Ehud Gavron