South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34
Break out the popcorn. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html -- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
So, $20 tax on all computers sold in SC in practice On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, 11:41 PM Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net> wrote:
Break out the popcorn.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html
-- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Users are crafty. One user on a network I had to admin use to mail porn has Microsoft Word documents to his Gmail account. So if you want to stop porn, you have to ban file attachments and monospace fonts. Good luck with that. On 20 December 2016 at 09:25, Jippen <cheetahmorph@gmail.com> wrote:
So, $20 tax on all computers sold in SC in practice
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, 11:41 PM Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net> wrote:
Break out the popcorn.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html
-- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
-- -- ℱin del ℳensaje.
Let's call it for what it is. It's a new tax. The manufactures/stores etc. wont want to he held liable and they will simply include the cost when selling a PC (does anyone other than us buy one of those these days?) On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> wrote:
Users are crafty.
One user on a network I had to admin use to mail porn has Microsoft Word documents to his Gmail account.
So if you want to stop porn, you have to ban file attachments and monospace fonts.
Good luck with that.
On 20 December 2016 at 09:25, Jippen <cheetahmorph@gmail.com> wrote:
So, $20 tax on all computers sold in SC in practice
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, 11:41 PM Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net> wrote:
Break out the popcorn.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html
-- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
-- -- ℱin del ℳensaje.
In article <CAM3TTh38kDSuGbO6am+cmm-CZVH5PVXYND08mMwP=rVnFza-Jg@mail.gmail.com> you write:
Let's call it for what it is. It's a new tax.
No, it's just grandstanding. The proposed law egregiously violates the First Amendment and wouldn't last 5 minutes in a court challenge. R's, John
On 12/19/2016 11:39 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Break out the popcorn.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html
"A bill pre-filed this month by state Rep. Bill Chumley would require sellers to install digital blocking capabilities on computers and other devices that access the internet to prevent the viewing of obscene content." 1. Buy computer without the $20 tax 2. Erase operating system 3. Install Linux Mint (or one's favourite distribution) 4. PROFIT! "The bill would fine manufacturers that sell a device without the blocking system..." How about if the manufacturer doesn't install an operating system? Getting this vaguely back to NANOG territory, this is a far greater improvement over the "plan" to have ISPs block the traffic on their side of the customer/ISP interface. THAT is just an invitation to pick up a mallet and play whack-a-mole... (N.B.: if this were extended to other states, like Nevada, then stores like Suzie's in Reno would only increase their business selling porn DVDs.)
participants (6)
-
Dovid Bender -
Jay Hennigan -
Jippen -
John Levine -
Stephen Satchell -
Tei