id BC1804DF47; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:41:53 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trapdoor.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfD9rZGYV1iq for <nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mozart.merit.edu (mozart.merit.edu [198.108.95.9]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE6B4DF47 for <nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bach.merit.edu (razorgate.merit.edu [198.108.95.7]) by mozart.merit.edu (MOS 3.8.2-GA) with ESMTP id AJW76100; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com (smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]) by bach.merit.edu (MOS 3.8.2-GA) with ESMTP id ADV37928; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.115]) by smtp4. smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:43:24 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: TCP congestion Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:44:57 +0100 Message-ID: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0AF5947@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemh ost.net> In-Reply-To: <14272.1184268577@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Thread-Topic: TCP congestion Thread-Index: AcfEu/7UMKRMPcbGSWycnzy61l7YvwAANReA References: <30366.27320.qm@web30805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <14272.1184268577@turin g-police.cc.vt.edu> From: <michael.dillon@bt.com> To: <nanog@merit.edu> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2007 19:43:24.0605 (UTC) FILETIME=[E90AE6D0:01C7C4 BC] Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu Precedence: bulk Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu X-Loop: nanog X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mozart.merit.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090201.469684F2.0150:SCGAP167720,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=198.108.1.26, so=2006-09-22 03:48:54, dmn=5.3.14/2007-05-31 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: NonJunk X-UID: 15

Who knows, maybe a few packets got corrupted on the wire, and=20 the TCP chucksum actually caught it and dropped the offending packets.

Or there could be flags in the bitstream... --Michael Dillon