WOW. After going through the string of emails on this subject, it really amazes me that someone would bash someone else in regards to getting correct support. This appeared to be a legitimate need for support, & Regardless of the nature of the problem, as Mr. Urban suggests, quite correctly, this gentleman Mr. Dills could not get support when he required it, & was shuffled around. In fact, someone suggested that he would have had" greater sympathy " for this gentleman if he was really down. & if it had of been a legitimate routing problem, it would have been " more interesting ". Now, we all can understand with the state of the industry, that support response times & support in general might just be a bit stretched these days. But no sympathy, or would have had greater sympathy, come on. Infact, reading further emails, it appears that this gentleman, Mr. Dills DID have a routing issue. & once he lit into his provider, via NANOG, they did not like the exposure & quickly gave him some assistance. Now, NANOG is really not the place to b****, but if it works... Greater sympathy.... ?? More interesting if it was a routing problem... When it appears it was... Wonder if they treat their customers like that at Sockeye Networks. A customer is a customer, plain & simple. Dont tell him you will call him back in 30 minutes then shuffle him off. For a day. Regards.
-----Original Message----- From: Gregory Urban [mailto:urban@cs.umbc.edu] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:14 AM To: Daniel Golding; nanog@merit.edu Subject: RE: Qwest Support
You totally missed the point. Had this been a real emergency, he would be unable to get resolution since Qwest was unable to dredge up a clue within their customer support machine.
Greg U
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 19:07:47 GMT From: "internetguy205@hotmail.com" <internetguy205@hotmail.com>
Am I correct that NANOG participants are to give their REAL names? Before judging others, at least play by the rules. Sorry, but on this list, a Hotmail address just seems... tacky. If you wish to speak up, identify yourself. If you haven't enough faith in your messages to claim them... Yes, the support -- or lack thereof -- sounds rather scary. But personally I'd rather get blasted by { Randy | Paul | Daniel | Avi | Patrick | Bill | Bill | Sean | Sean | ... } and get something from it than to have sugar-coated puff talk and drivel. Not that I always agree with all of them by any means -- but a high enough clue concentration SHOULD make one stop and think WHY they say what they do. The relationships here are peer-to-peer, not customer-vendor. Such is the way that geek lists run. (And I'm just a baby -- inet-access in '97 was my first list -- "basement multihomer".) -- Eddy Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
participants (2)
-
E.B. Dreger
-
internetguy205ļ¼ hotmail.com