At 11:13 PM 06-01-03 -0800, Bulger, Tim wrote: I suggest showing them the results of "sho ip bgp damp damp | incl 7018" from route-views.oregon-ix.net (or even from route-server.ip.att.net). I get close to 800 prefixes as being suppressed (some for up to an hour). More details can be seen via: "sho ip bgp damp flap reg 7018" -Hank

Has anyone else noticed any ususal oddities in AS7018 over the last half hour or so? I saw BGP advertisements flap en masse and we are still experiencing strange connectivity issues that reek of inconsistent CEF tables.. Their NOC claims there are no problems.

Tracing the route to 159.153.226.19

1 12.119.156.21 [AS 7018] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 2 gbr1-p30.auttx.ip.att.net (12.123.133.54) [AS 7018] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec 3 * * * 4 tbr2-p013701.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.90) [AS 7018] 20 msec 20 msec 20 msec 5 * * * 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * Tracing the route to 159.153.226.20

1 12.119.156.21 [AS 7018] 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec 2 gbr1-p30.auttx.ip.att.net (12.123.133.54) [AS 7018] 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec 3 * * * 4 tbr2-p013701.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.90) [AS 7018] 20 msec 20 msec 20 msec 5 tbr1-p012401.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.9.141) [AS 7018] 20 msec 20 msec 20 msec 6 tbr1-p012401.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.10.65) [AS 7018] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 7 gbr5-p10.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.11.170) [AS 7018] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 8 gar3-p360.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.123.9.65) [AS 7018] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 9 gar1-p371.abnva.ip.att.net (12.123.217.2) [AS 7018] 40 msec 40 msec 36 msec 10 12.119.141.58 [AS 7018] 40 msec 36 msec 40 msec 11 159.153.224.218 [AS 7018] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec

Regards, Tim Bulger Senior Network Engineer Electronic Arts