1299 capacity constraints
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed? Off-list is fine, I am just trying to get a sense of what is going on there. Thanks, -Drew
On 7/14/23 13:55, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed?
We pick them up in London, so we haven't seen that. But we also have a healthy mix of transit providers + peering, so we may not be as exposed. YMMV based on where you pick them up and what other options you have. Mark.
Same in the continental US via Chicago, no widespread issues here but we egress less than 100gbps via 1299 so we’re small potatoes. We sometimes notice QUIC streams to 7018 having trouble, but nothing worth complaining about yet. Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2023, at 12:15, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
On 7/14/23 13:55, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed?
We pick them up in London, so we haven't seen that. But we also have a healthy mix of transit providers + peering, so we may not be as exposed.
YMMV based on where you pick them up and what other options you have.
Mark.
It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Unfortunately these days, having uncongested path requires paying a lot of attention and distributing your traffic yourself rather than simply handing it off to your transit providers. On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 7:57 AM Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote:
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed?
Off-list is fine, I am just trying to get a sense of what is going on there.
Thanks,
-Drew
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately.
Whoa. I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for connectivity. Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in this day and age? ^_^; Matt
Tier1.. likely via fiber, not old fashioned telco based T1 circuits. Whoa. I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for connectivity. Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in this day and age? ^_^;
Someone else made this joke via direct email. Old minds think alike? On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately.
Whoa.
I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for connectivity. Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in this day and age? ^_^;
Matt
I will admit, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw “T-1” ☺ Greg Dickinson Network Engineer [cid:image001.png@01D2DDE3.06E76B70] From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+greg.dickinson=bryantbank.com@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Ross Tajvar Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2023 10:42 PM To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: 1299 capacity constraints This Message originates from outside Bryant Bank. Please use caution when opening this correspondence, attachments or hyperlinks (URLs). If you have questions, please contact IT Support. Thank you. Someone else made this joke via direct email. Old minds think alike? On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com<mailto:mpetach@netflight.com>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io<mailto:ross@tajvar.io>> wrote: It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Whoa. I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for connectivity. Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in this day and age? ^_^; Matt NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, print, save, copy, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete copies. Thank you.
participants (7)
-
Daniel Marks -
Drew Weaver -
Greg Dickinson -
Jerry Cloe -
Mark Tinka -
Matthew Petach -
Ross Tajvar