Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
Eric; The only reason I would have supported rejecting the proposal is the 'morality' language related to offensive TLD's. . What's your take on that part of the process? Marty ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net> To: Martin Hannigan Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>; =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_?=@mxa.skyrr.is <=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_?=@mxa.skyrr.is> Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008 Subject: Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Martin, I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements. This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to completion in 2003 and 2004 -- after the initial 2000 round. Eric Martin Hannigan wrote:
See pages 17 - 20 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf See pages 22 - 25 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
I think that this is a good read as well, especially the comments by Dave Wodeley, Susan Crawford, and Wendy Seltzer.
https://par.icann.org/files/paris/BoardMeeting_26June08.txt
Best,
Martin
Martin, You know the phrase "Paris is worth a mass"? Well, we get .paris, as well as .cat, and other reasonable things, plus chaff and clutter. Eric Martin Hannigan wrote:
Eric;
The only reason I would have supported rejecting the proposal is the 'morality' language related to offensive TLD's. .
What's your take on that part of the process?
Marty
----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net> To: Martin Hannigan Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>; =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_?=@mxa.skyrr.is <=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_?=@mxa.skyrr.is> Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008 Subject: Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
Martin,
I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements.
This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to completion in 2003 and 2004 -- after the initial 2000 round.
Eric
Martin Hannigan wrote:
See pages 17 - 20 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf See pages 22 - 25 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
I think that this is a good read as well, especially the comments by Dave Wodeley, Susan Crawford, and Wendy Seltzer.
https://par.icann.org/files/paris/BoardMeeting_26June08.txt
Best,
Martin
participants (2)
-
Eric Brunner-Williams -
Martin Hannigan