Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP
From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch@corp.earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:38:57 -0500
On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
I fail to see a usage for smaller ISP that are using BGP only for peering and OSPF internaly.
Why would you need to sim this at small scale?
How about for a net that has 540+ networks? It would be interesting to see what happens if you perturb this BEFORE you do the perturbation...
Thanks, Christian
------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3400 San Jose, CA 95134 | Internet: ghicks@cadence.com I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely learn a great deal today. "A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the decision." - Benjamin Franklin "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton
On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote:
From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch@corp.earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:38:57 -0500
On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
I fail to see a usage for smaller ISP that are using BGP only for peering and OSPF internaly.
Why would you need to sim this at small scale?
How about for a net that has 540+ networks? It would be interesting to see what happens if you perturb this BEFORE you do the perturbation...
*sigh* You just made me speechless. All I can come with is "Well, DUH!" *sigh*
participants (2)
-
Christian Kuhtz
-
Gregory Hicks