Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
Daniel, it shows that you live in the world where 1000+ internet service providers isn't reality yet :) A half of them has to be explained how route announcement is different from broadcasting. Forget about good citizenship -- they may be willing but they must be educated first. --vadim
Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net> writes:
Routing Registry w/o means to enforce won't be able to keep a resemblance of accurate data (not with the modus operandi of most providers in US).
We fundamentally disagree here. I agree that the more the RR is used for actual configurations, the better the data will be. I disagree that "enforcement" is necessary. I disagree that "enforcement" by RS is necessary. I observe that reasonable quality data can be gathered even when the only incentive is good citizenship and nice diagnostic tools. Daniel
Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net> writes: Daniel, it shows that you live in the world where 1000+ internet service providers isn't reality yet :)
A half of them has to be explained how route announcement is different from broadcasting. Forget about good citizenship -- they may be willing but they must be educated first.
That is why we are doing it on this side of the pond. The PRIDE project had a big DEPLOYMENT in it and we have held 6 1-day courses on how to use the RR for the service providers. Last time I looked the NCC was dealing with 142 service providers directly. I assume there is a large number of local resellers which we do not see. But even counting only the bigger ones we are only an order of magnitude off your "world". Yes we also (try to) educate the new ones about other things. Daniel
participants (2)
-
Daniel Karrenberg -
Vadim Antonov