Re: BGP in the Washngton Post
--- bill@herrin.us wrote: From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> Interesting story about BGP and security in the Washington Post today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2015/05/31/net-of-insecurity-part-... ------------------------------------------------ Great article for the WP and they asked good questions from the correct people, but I have to take issue with the lack of network operator's participation comments: : But getting network operators to participate is proving : difficult. : Many network operators also are cool to taking the further : step of adopting a secure new routing protocol called BGPSEC : to replace BGP. : “Unless [network] operators can see that the benefits will : generally outweigh the costs, they just won’t deploy it.” It's more that the managers who have no idea what is going on are forcing operators to focus their attention elsewhere, rather than the important things until everyone's behind the 8-ball. Then, all of the sudden, the mostly clueless managers are all about it. But, by then it's too late. Farting in a hurricane and hoping it makes a difference... ;-) scott
participants (1)
-
Scott Weeks